[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABgObfY=3msvJ2M-gHMqawcoaW5CDVDVxCO0jWi+6wrcrsEtAw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 13:22:29 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Zixi Chen <zixchen@...hat.com>, Adam Dunlap <acdunlap@...gle.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>, Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>,
Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] x86/cpu: fix invalid MTRR mask values for SEV or TME
On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 11:02 PM Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com> wrote:
> Your patches make things a wee bit worse in the meantime, but they pale
> in comparison to the random spaghetti that we've already got. Also, we
> probably need the early TME stuff regardless.
>
> I think I'll probably suck it up, apply them, then fix them up along
> with the greater mess.
>
> Anybody have any better ideas?
Ping, in the end are we applying these patches for either 6.8 or 6.9?
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists