linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] x86/cpu: fix invalid MTRR mask values for SEV or TME

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 10:06:56 -0800
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
 Zixi Chen <zixchen@...hat.com>, Adam Dunlap <acdunlap@...gle.com>,
 "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
 Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>, Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>,
 Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
 x86@...nel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] x86/cpu: fix invalid MTRR mask values for SEV or
 TME

On 2/20/24 04:22, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 11:02 PM Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com> wrote:
>> Your patches make things a wee bit worse in the meantime, but they pale
>> in comparison to the random spaghetti that we've already got.  Also, we
>> probably need the early TME stuff regardless.
>>
>> I think I'll probably suck it up, apply them, then fix them up along
>> with the greater mess.
>>
>> Anybody have any better ideas?
> Ping, in the end are we applying these patches for either 6.8 or 6.9?

Let me poke at them and see if we can stick them in x86/urgent early
next week.  They do fix an actual bug that's biting people, right?