linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 18/23] gpio: nomadik: support mobileye,eyeq5-gpio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdYLBGsphNkmWyPXQZvFaO2hHGHGTMt1eqz-HAa2k5F3bg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 15:31:35 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@...tlin.com>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>, 
	linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, 
	linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>, 
	Vladimir Kondratiev <vladimir.kondratiev@...ileye.com>, 
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>, Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik.bayouk@...ileye.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/23] gpio: nomadik: support mobileye,eyeq5-gpio

On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 5:24 PM Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@...tlin.com> wrote:

> We create a custom compatible for the STA2X11 IP block as integrated
> into the Mobileye EyeQ5 platform. Its wake and alternate functions have
> been disabled, we want to avoid touching those registers.
>
> We both do: (1) early return in functions that do not support the
> platform, but with warnings, and (2) avoid calling those functions in
> the first place.
>
> We ensure that pinctrl-nomadik is not used with this STA2X11 variant.
>
> Signed-off-by: Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@...tlin.com>

When testing I noticed that this patch breaks Ux500 (up until patch 17
all works fine!).

But I don't know why.

Trying to figure it out...

Yours,
Linus Walleij