linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kselftest/arm64: Test that ptrace takes effect in the target process

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 18:24:14 +0000
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Dave Martin <dave.martin@....com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kselftest/arm64: Test that ptrace takes effect in the target process

On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 21:05:03 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> While we have test coverage for the ptrace interface in our selftests
> the current programs have a number of gaps. The testing is done per
> regset so does not cover interactions and at no point do any of the
> tests actually run the traced processes meaning that there is no
> validation that anything we read or write corresponds to register values
> the process actually sees. Let's add a new program which attempts to cover
> these gaps.
> 
> [...]

Applied to arm64 (for-next/kselftest), thanks!

[1/1] kselftest/arm64: Test that ptrace takes effect in the target process
      https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/c745b15c1f9c

-- 
Catalin