[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240221234732.187629-6-vishal.moola@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 15:47:32 -0800
From: "Vishal Moola (Oracle)" <vishal.moola@...il.com>
To: linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
muchun.song@...ux.dev,
willy@...radead.org,
"Vishal Moola (Oracle)" <vishal.moola@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 5/5] hugetlb: Allow faults to be handled under the VMA lock
Hugetlb can now safely handle faults under the VMA lock, so allow it to
do so.
This patch may cause ltp hugemmap10 to "fail". Hugemmap10 tests hugetlb
counters, and expects the counters to remain unchanged on failure to
handle a fault.
In hugetlb_no_page(), vmf_anon_prepare() may bailout with no anon_vma
under the VMA lock after allocating a folio for the hugepage. In
free_huge_folio(), this folio is completely freed on bailout iff there
is a surplus of hugetlb pages. This will remove a folio off the freelist
and decrement the number of hugepages while ltp expects these counters
to remain unchanged on failure.
Originally this could only happen due to OOM failures, but now it may
also occur after we allocate a hugetlb folio without a suitable anon_vma
under the VMA lock. This should only happen for the first freshly
allocated hugepage in this vma.
Signed-off-by: Vishal Moola (Oracle) <vishal.moola@...il.com>
---
mm/hugetlb.c | 6 ------
1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index ae8c8b3da981..688017ca0cc2 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -6354,12 +6354,6 @@ vm_fault_t hugetlb_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
*/
};
- /* TODO: Handle faults under the VMA lock */
- if (flags & FAULT_FLAG_VMA_LOCK) {
- vma_end_read(vma);
- return VM_FAULT_RETRY;
- }
-
/*
* Serialize hugepage allocation and instantiation, so that we don't
* get spurious allocation failures if two CPUs race to instantiate
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists