[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<SHXPR01MB0863DBBEB8C6AD12F3C0056DE657A@SHXPR01MB0863.CHNPR01.prod.partner.outlook.cn>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 10:10:48 +0000
From: Minda Chen <minda.chen@...rfivetech.com>
To: David Abdurachmanov <david.abdurachmanov@...il.com>
CC: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Wilczyński
<kw@...ux.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas
<bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>, Thomas
Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Daire McNamara <daire.mcnamara@...rochip.com>,
Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@...onical.com>, Krzysztof
Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, "devicetree@...r.kernel.org"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, Palmer
Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, Philipp
Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, Mason Huo <mason.huo@...rfivetech.com>,
Leyfoon Tan <leyfoon.tan@...rfivetech.com>, Kevin Xie
<kevin.xie@...rfivetech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 15/23] PCI: microchip: Add event irqchip field to host
port and add PLDA irqchip
>
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 1:02 PM Minda Chen <minda.chen@...rfivetech.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > >
> > > As PLDA dts binding doc(Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/
> > > plda,xpressrich3-axi-common.yaml) showed, PLDA PCIe contains an
> > > interrupt controller.
> > >
> > > Microchip PolarFire PCIE event IRQs includes PLDA interrupts and
> > > Polarfire their own interrupts. The interrupt irqchip ops includes
> > > ack/mask/unmask interrupt ops, which will write correct registers.
> > > Microchip Polarfire PCIe additional interrupts require to write
> > > Polarfire SoC self-defined registers. So Microchip PCIe event irqchip ops can
> not be re-used.
> > >
> > > To support PLDA its own event IRQ process, implements PLDA irqchip
> > > ops and add event irqchip field to struct pcie_plda_rp.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Minda Chen <minda.chen@...rfivetech.com>
> > > Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
> > > ---
> > > .../pci/controller/plda/pcie-microchip-host.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++-
> > > drivers/pci/controller/plda/pcie-plda.h | 3 +
> > > 2 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/plda/pcie-microchip-host.c
> > > b/drivers/pci/controller/plda/pcie-microchip-host.c
> > > index b3df373a2141..beaf5c27da84 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/plda/pcie-microchip-host.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/plda/pcie-microchip-host.c
> > > @@ -770,6 +770,64 @@ static struct irq_chip mc_event_irq_chip = {
> > > .irq_unmask = mc_unmask_event_irq, };
> > >
> > Hi Thomas
> > I think this patch code it is easy to review. If you busy, Could you
> > let other IRQ maintainer review? Thanks.
> >
> > Hi Lorenzo, Bjorn and Krzysztof
>
> Hi Minda,
>
> This patchset seems to have broken threading (lore, mailman). I have seen other
> folks on IRC mentioning that too.
>
> I am not sure if that requires re-sending, but let's wait for others to comment.
>
> Cheers,
> david
>
Do you mean the auto test error in linux-riscv?
I can see that. But In v14 resend version, There is no error. Version 15 just add
a new patch. Other no change. It is very strange.
If not this error, I will waiting others comment.
> > Now the code is pending several weeks. Maybe this patch is blocking.
> > Actually I write irqchip ops(ack/mask/unmask) like microchip irqchip ops.
> > They looks very simple that write PLDA mask or status register. They
> > all call the same function plda_hwirq_to_mask(). Now you can see this
> function below.
> > Except INTx interrupt, one irqnum mapping to one register bit. The
> > PLDA register graph can be seen 14th patch, which can show all the
> > PLDA interrupts and easy to get PLDA codes logic.
> >
> > Now the 6.9-next will be closed less than 20 days. I still hope the
> > refactoring patches (patch 1 - 16) can be accepted to 6.9. (Starfive
> > and PLDA patches have to be delayed to 6.10 or later). I will try my
> > best to achieve it because this series patches reviewed lasts a long period and
> Conor have reviewed all the refactoring patches.
> >
> > I have no experience in refactoring code before this series patches. I try my
> best to do this.
> > Maybe I did something wrong in this. Please forgive me.
> >
> > > +static u32 plda_hwirq_to_mask(int hwirq) {
> > > + u32 mask;
> > > +
> > > + /* hwirq 23 - 0 are the same with register */
> > > + if (hwirq < EVENT_PM_MSI_INT_INTX)
> > > + mask = BIT(hwirq);
> > > + else if (hwirq == EVENT_PM_MSI_INT_INTX)
> > > + mask = PM_MSI_INT_INTX_MASK;
> > > + else
> > > + mask = BIT(hwirq + PCI_NUM_INTX - 1);
> > > +
> > > + return mask;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void plda_ack_event_irq(struct irq_data *data) {
> > > + struct plda_pcie_rp *port = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> > > +
> > > + writel_relaxed(plda_hwirq_to_mask(data->hwirq),
> > > + port->bridge_addr + ISTATUS_LOCAL); }
> > > +
> > > +static void plda_mask_event_irq(struct irq_data *data) {
> > > + struct plda_pcie_rp *port = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> > > + u32 mask, val;
> > > +
> > > + mask = plda_hwirq_to_mask(data->hwirq);
> > > +
> > > + raw_spin_lock(&port->lock);
> > > + val = readl_relaxed(port->bridge_addr + IMASK_LOCAL);
> > > + val &= ~mask;
> > > + writel_relaxed(val, port->bridge_addr + IMASK_LOCAL);
> > > + raw_spin_unlock(&port->lock);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void plda_unmask_event_irq(struct irq_data *data) {
> > > + struct plda_pcie_rp *port = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> > > + u32 mask, val;
> > > +
> > > + mask = plda_hwirq_to_mask(data->hwirq);
> > > +
> > > + raw_spin_lock(&port->lock);
> > > + val = readl_relaxed(port->bridge_addr + IMASK_LOCAL);
> > > + val |= mask;
> > > + writel_relaxed(val, port->bridge_addr + IMASK_LOCAL);
> > > + raw_spin_unlock(&port->lock);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static struct irq_chip plda_event_irq_chip = {
> > > + .name = "PLDA PCIe EVENT",
> > > + .irq_ack = plda_ack_event_irq,
> > > + .irq_mask = plda_mask_event_irq,
> > > + .irq_unmask = plda_unmask_event_irq, };
> > > +
> > > static const struct plda_event_ops plda_event_ops = {
> > > .get_events = plda_get_events, }; @@ -777,7 +835,9 @@ static
> > > const struct plda_event_ops plda_event_ops = { static int
> > > plda_pcie_event_map(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int irq,
> > > irq_hw_number_t hwirq) {
> > > - irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &mc_event_irq_chip,
> handle_level_irq);
> > > + struct plda_pcie_rp *port = (void *)domain->host_data;
> > > +
> > > + irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, port->event_irq_chip,
> handle_level_irq);
> > > irq_set_chip_data(irq, domain->host_data);
> > >
> > > return 0;
> > > @@ -962,6 +1022,9 @@ static int plda_init_interrupts(struct
> platform_device
> > > *pdev,
> > > if (!port->event_ops)
> > > port->event_ops = &plda_event_ops;
> > >
> > > + if (!port->event_irq_chip)
> > > + port->event_irq_chip = &plda_event_irq_chip;
> > > +
> > > ret = plda_pcie_init_irq_domains(port);
> > > if (ret) {
> > > dev_err(dev, "failed creating IRQ domains\n"); @@
> -1039,6 +1102,7
> > > @@ static int mc_platform_init(struct pci_config_window *cfg)
> > > return ret;
> > >
> > > port->plda.event_ops = &mc_event_ops;
> > > + port->plda.event_irq_chip = &mc_event_irq_chip;
> > >
> > > /* Address translation is up; safe to enable interrupts */
> > > ret = plda_init_interrupts(pdev, &port->plda, &mc_event); diff --git
> > > a/drivers/pci/controller/plda/pcie-plda.h
> > > b/drivers/pci/controller/plda/pcie-plda.h
> > > index e0e5e7cc8434..a3ce01735bea 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/plda/pcie-plda.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/plda/pcie-plda.h
> > > @@ -107,6 +107,8 @@ enum plda_int_event {
> > >
> > > #define PLDA_NUM_DMA_EVENTS 16
> > >
> > > +#define EVENT_PM_MSI_INT_INTX
> (PLDA_NUM_DMA_EVENTS +
> > > PLDA_INTX)
> > > +#define EVENT_PM_MSI_INT_MSI
> (PLDA_NUM_DMA_EVENTS +
> > > PLDA_MSI)
> > > #define PLDA_MAX_EVENT_NUM
> (PLDA_NUM_DMA_EVENTS +
> > > PLDA_INT_EVENT_NUM)
> > >
> > > /*
> > > @@ -155,6 +157,7 @@ struct plda_pcie_rp {
> > > raw_spinlock_t lock;
> > > struct plda_msi msi;
> > > const struct plda_event_ops *event_ops;
> > > + const struct irq_chip *event_irq_chip;
> > > void __iomem *bridge_addr;
> > > int num_events;
> > > };
> > > --
> > > 2.17.1
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-riscv mailing list
> > linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
Powered by blists - more mailing lists