[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEn-LTphwFA6KgCZWsqiMMob2Xw4t4sCZ70U0u0z2=yJOpyGHA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 14:09:06 +0200
From: David Abdurachmanov <david.abdurachmanov@...il.com>
To: Minda Chen <minda.chen@...rfivetech.com>
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Daire McNamara <daire.mcnamara@...rochip.com>,
Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@...onical.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, Mason Huo <mason.huo@...rfivetech.com>,
Leyfoon Tan <leyfoon.tan@...rfivetech.com>, Kevin Xie <kevin.xie@...rfivetech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 15/23] PCI: microchip: Add event irqchip field to host
port and add PLDA irqchip
On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 1:02 PM Minda Chen <minda.chen@...rfivetechcom> wrote:
>
>
> >
> > As PLDA dts binding doc(Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/
> > plda,xpressrich3-axi-common.yaml) showed, PLDA PCIe contains an interrupt
> > controller.
> >
> > Microchip PolarFire PCIE event IRQs includes PLDA interrupts and Polarfire their
> > own interrupts. The interrupt irqchip ops includes ack/mask/unmask interrupt
> > ops, which will write correct registers.
> > Microchip Polarfire PCIe additional interrupts require to write Polarfire SoC
> > self-defined registers. So Microchip PCIe event irqchip ops can not be re-used.
> >
> > To support PLDA its own event IRQ process, implements PLDA irqchip ops and
> > add event irqchip field to struct pcie_plda_rp.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Minda Chen <minda.chen@...rfivetech.com>
> > Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
> > ---
> > .../pci/controller/plda/pcie-microchip-host.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++-
> > drivers/pci/controller/plda/pcie-plda.h | 3 +
> > 2 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/plda/pcie-microchip-host.c
> > b/drivers/pci/controller/plda/pcie-microchip-host.c
> > index b3df373a2141..beaf5c27da84 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/plda/pcie-microchip-host.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/plda/pcie-microchip-host.c
> > @@ -770,6 +770,64 @@ static struct irq_chip mc_event_irq_chip = {
> > .irq_unmask = mc_unmask_event_irq,
> > };
> >
> Hi Thomas
> I think this patch code it is easy to review. If you busy, Could you let other
> IRQ maintainer review? Thanks.
>
> Hi Lorenzo, Bjorn and Krzysztof
Hi Minda,
This patchset seems to have broken threading (lore, mailman). I have
seen other folks on IRC mentioning that too.
I am not sure if that requires re-sending, but let's wait for others to comment.
Cheers,
david
> Now the code is pending several weeks. Maybe this patch is blocking.
> Actually I write irqchip ops(ack/mask/unmask) like microchip irqchip ops.
> They looks very simple that write PLDA mask or status register. They all call the
> same function plda_hwirq_to_mask(). Now you can see this function below.
> Except INTx interrupt, one irqnum mapping to one register bit. The PLDA register
> graph can be seen 14th patch, which can show all the PLDA interrupts and easy to
> get PLDA codes logic.
>
> Now the 6.9-next will be closed less than 20 days. I still hope the refactoring patches
> (patch 1 - 16) can be accepted to 6.9. (Starfive and PLDA patches have to be delayed
> to 6.10 or later). I will try my best to achieve it because this series patches reviewed lasts
> a long period and Conor have reviewed all the refactoring patches.
>
> I have no experience in refactoring code before this series patches. I try my best to do this.
> Maybe I did something wrong in this. Please forgive me.
>
> > +static u32 plda_hwirq_to_mask(int hwirq) {
> > + u32 mask;
> > +
> > + /* hwirq 23 - 0 are the same with register */
> > + if (hwirq < EVENT_PM_MSI_INT_INTX)
> > + mask = BIT(hwirq);
> > + else if (hwirq == EVENT_PM_MSI_INT_INTX)
> > + mask = PM_MSI_INT_INTX_MASK;
> > + else
> > + mask = BIT(hwirq + PCI_NUM_INTX - 1);
> > +
> > + return mask;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void plda_ack_event_irq(struct irq_data *data) {
> > + struct plda_pcie_rp *port = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> > +
> > + writel_relaxed(plda_hwirq_to_mask(data->hwirq),
> > + port->bridge_addr + ISTATUS_LOCAL); }
> > +
> > +static void plda_mask_event_irq(struct irq_data *data) {
> > + struct plda_pcie_rp *port = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> > + u32 mask, val;
> > +
> > + mask = plda_hwirq_to_mask(data->hwirq);
> > +
> > + raw_spin_lock(&port->lock);
> > + val = readl_relaxed(port->bridge_addr + IMASK_LOCAL);
> > + val &= ~mask;
> > + writel_relaxed(val, port->bridge_addr + IMASK_LOCAL);
> > + raw_spin_unlock(&port->lock);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void plda_unmask_event_irq(struct irq_data *data) {
> > + struct plda_pcie_rp *port = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> > + u32 mask, val;
> > +
> > + mask = plda_hwirq_to_mask(data->hwirq);
> > +
> > + raw_spin_lock(&port->lock);
> > + val = readl_relaxed(port->bridge_addr + IMASK_LOCAL);
> > + val |= mask;
> > + writel_relaxed(val, port->bridge_addr + IMASK_LOCAL);
> > + raw_spin_unlock(&port->lock);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static struct irq_chip plda_event_irq_chip = {
> > + .name = "PLDA PCIe EVENT",
> > + .irq_ack = plda_ack_event_irq,
> > + .irq_mask = plda_mask_event_irq,
> > + .irq_unmask = plda_unmask_event_irq,
> > +};
> > +
> > static const struct plda_event_ops plda_event_ops = {
> > .get_events = plda_get_events,
> > };
> > @@ -777,7 +835,9 @@ static const struct plda_event_ops plda_event_ops =
> > { static int plda_pcie_event_map(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int irq,
> > irq_hw_number_t hwirq)
> > {
> > - irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &mc_event_irq_chip, handle_level_irq);
> > + struct plda_pcie_rp *port = (void *)domain->host_data;
> > +
> > + irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, port->event_irq_chip, handle_level_irq);
> > irq_set_chip_data(irq, domain->host_data);
> >
> > return 0;
> > @@ -962,6 +1022,9 @@ static int plda_init_interrupts(struct platform_device
> > *pdev,
> > if (!port->event_ops)
> > port->event_ops = &plda_event_ops;
> >
> > + if (!port->event_irq_chip)
> > + port->event_irq_chip = &plda_event_irq_chip;
> > +
> > ret = plda_pcie_init_irq_domains(port);
> > if (ret) {
> > dev_err(dev, "failed creating IRQ domains\n"); @@ -1039,6 +1102,7
> > @@ static int mc_platform_init(struct pci_config_window *cfg)
> > return ret;
> >
> > port->plda.event_ops = &mc_event_ops;
> > + port->plda.event_irq_chip = &mc_event_irq_chip;
> >
> > /* Address translation is up; safe to enable interrupts */
> > ret = plda_init_interrupts(pdev, &port->plda, &mc_event); diff --git
> > a/drivers/pci/controller/plda/pcie-plda.h
> > b/drivers/pci/controller/plda/pcie-plda.h
> > index e0e5e7cc8434..a3ce01735bea 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/plda/pcie-plda.h
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/plda/pcie-plda.h
> > @@ -107,6 +107,8 @@ enum plda_int_event {
> >
> > #define PLDA_NUM_DMA_EVENTS 16
> >
> > +#define EVENT_PM_MSI_INT_INTX (PLDA_NUM_DMA_EVENTS +
> > PLDA_INTX)
> > +#define EVENT_PM_MSI_INT_MSI (PLDA_NUM_DMA_EVENTS +
> > PLDA_MSI)
> > #define PLDA_MAX_EVENT_NUM (PLDA_NUM_DMA_EVENTS +
> > PLDA_INT_EVENT_NUM)
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -155,6 +157,7 @@ struct plda_pcie_rp {
> > raw_spinlock_t lock;
> > struct plda_msi msi;
> > const struct plda_event_ops *event_ops;
> > + const struct irq_chip *event_irq_chip;
> > void __iomem *bridge_addr;
> > int num_events;
> > };
> > --
> > 2.17.1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
Powered by blists - more mailing lists