linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: core: Fix setup_xfer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9eb36b38-87a3-4619-be64-8a6ccf3b407d@acm.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 19:09:07 -0800
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Can Guo <quic_cang@...cinc.com>, Rohit Ner <rohitner@...gle.com>,
 Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>, Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
 "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
 Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
Cc: Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: core: Fix setup_xfer_req invocation

On 2/21/24 18:05, Can Guo wrote:
> The if-statement you are mentioning here, is it the if (hba->vops && hba->vops->setup_xfer_req) or if (is_mcq_enabled(hba))?

Hi Can,

I was referring to the latter if-statement, at least if it would occur in the
code that you plan to post and that I haven't seen yet.

Thanks,

Bart.