[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <43434831-48de-42d1-9f2c-04520ea54534@kylinos.cn>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 11:10:20 +0800
From: Kunwu Chan <chentao@...inos.cn>
To: dsterba@...e.cz
Cc: clm@...com, josef@...icpanda.com, dsterba@...e.com,
linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] btrfs: Use KMEM_CACHE instead of kmem_cache_create
On 2024/2/21 20:00, David Sterba wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 05:06:39PM +0800, Kunwu Chan wrote:
>> As David Sterba said in
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240205160408.GI355@twin.jikos.cz/
>> I'm using a patchset to cleanup the same issues in the 'brtfs' module.
>>
>> For where the cache name and the structure name match.
>> Use the new KMEM_CACHE() macro instead of direct kmem_cache_create
>> to simplify the creation of SLAB caches.
>>
>> Kunwu Chan (6):
>> btrfs: Simplify the allocation of slab caches in
>> btrfs_delayed_inode_init
>> btrfs: Simplify the allocation of slab caches in ordered_data_init
>> btrfs: Simplify the allocation of slab caches in
>> btrfs_transaction_init
>> btrfs: Simplify the allocation of slab caches in btrfs_ctree_init
>> btrfs: Simplify the allocation of slab caches in
>> btrfs_delayed_ref_init
>> btrfs: Simplify the allocation of slab caches in btrfs_free_space_init
>
> Added to for-next, thanks. I've edited the changels so the name of the
> structure is mentioned rather than the function where it happens, and
> did some minor formatting adjustments.
It's ok, thanks for your adjustments.
--
Thanks,
Kunwu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists