linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm: userfaultfd: fix unexpected change to src_folio when UFFDIO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJuCfpGznL_4PJXq6JfYTR6VZ7H=xbdQYNN_DzS1QR3OtRHGEQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 13:41:22 -0800
From: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, 
	aarcange@...hat.com, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: userfaultfd: fix unexpected change to src_folio when
 UFFDIO_MOVE fails

On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 12:43 AM David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On 22.02.24 09:08, Qi Zheng wrote:
> > After ptep_clear_flush(), if we find that src_folio is pinned we will fail
> > UFFDIO_MOVE and put src_folio back to src_pte entry, but the change to
> > src_folio->{mapping,index} is not restored in this process. This is not
> > what we expected, so fix it.
> >
> > Fixes: adef440691ba ("userfaultfd: UFFDIO_MOVE uABI")
> > Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>
> > ---
> >   mm/userfaultfd.c | 6 +++---
> >   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/userfaultfd.c b/mm/userfaultfd.c
> > index 4744d6a96f96..503ea77c81aa 100644
> > --- a/mm/userfaultfd.c
> > +++ b/mm/userfaultfd.c
> > @@ -1008,9 +1008,6 @@ static int move_present_pte(struct mm_struct *mm,
> >               goto out;
> >       }
> >
> > -     folio_move_anon_rmap(src_folio, dst_vma);
> > -     WRITE_ONCE(src_folio->index, linear_page_index(dst_vma, dst_addr));
> > -
> >       orig_src_pte = ptep_clear_flush(src_vma, src_addr, src_pte);
> >       /* Folio got pinned from under us. Put it back and fail the move. */
> >       if (folio_maybe_dma_pinned(src_folio)) {
> > @@ -1019,6 +1016,9 @@ static int move_present_pte(struct mm_struct *mm,
> >               goto out;
> >       }
> >
> > +     folio_move_anon_rmap(src_folio, dst_vma);
> > +     WRITE_ONCE(src_folio->index, linear_page_index(dst_vma, dst_addr));
> > +
> >       orig_dst_pte = mk_pte(&src_folio->page, dst_vma->vm_page_prot);
> >       /* Follow mremap() behavior and treat the entry dirty after the move */
> >       orig_dst_pte = pte_mkwrite(pte_mkdirty(orig_dst_pte), dst_vma);
>
> Indeed, LGTM.
>
> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>

Thanks for catching this! Makes total sense to check before modification.

Reviewed-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>

>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> David / dhildenb
>