[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6ad3e87a-25ab-4938-8d81-c5c609619586@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 13:33:10 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Deepak Gupta <debug@...osinc.com>
Cc: rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com, Szabolcs.Nagy@....com,
kito.cheng@...ive.com, keescook@...omium.org,
ajones@...tanamicro.com, paul.walmsley@...ive.com,
palmer@...belt.com, conor.dooley@...rochip.com, cleger@...osinc.com,
atishp@...shpatra.org, alex@...ti.fr, bjorn@...osinc.com,
alexghiti@...osinc.com, corbet@....net, aou@...s.berkeley.edu,
oleg@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, arnd@...db.de,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, shuah@...nel.org, brauner@...nel.org,
guoren@...nel.org, samitolvanen@...gle.com, evan@...osinc.com,
xiao.w.wang@...el.com, apatel@...tanamicro.com,
mchitale@...tanamicro.com, waylingii@...il.com,
greentime.hu@...ive.com, heiko@...ech.de, jszhang@...nel.org,
shikemeng@...weicloud.com, david@...hat.com, charlie@...osinc.com,
panqinglin2020@...as.ac.cn, willy@...radead.org,
vincent.chen@...ive.com, andy.chiu@...ive.com, gerg@...nel.org,
jeeheng.sia@...rfivetech.com, mason.huo@...rfivetech.com,
ancientmodern4@...il.com, mathis.salmen@...sal.de,
cuiyunhui@...edance.com, bhe@...hat.com, chenjiahao16@...wei.com,
ruscur@...sell.cc, bgray@...ux.ibm.com, alx@...nel.org,
baruch@...s.co.il, zhangqing@...ngson.cn, catalin.marinas@....com,
revest@...omium.org, josh@...htriplett.org, joey.gouly@....com,
shr@...kernel.io, omosnace@...hat.com, ojeda@...nel.org,
jhubbard@...dia.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 15/28] riscv/mm: Implement map_shadow_stack()
syscall
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 04:47:11PM -0800, Deepak Gupta wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 04:01:28PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > +#define SHADOW_STACK_SET_TOKEN (1ULL << 0) /* Set up a restore token in the shadow stack */
> > For arm64 I also added a SHADOW_STACK_SET_MARKER for adding a top of
> > stack marker, did you have any thoughts on that for RISC-V? I think x86
> > were considering adding it too, it'd be good if we could get things
> > consistent.
> Please correct me on this. A token at the top which can't be consumed to restore
> but *just* purely as marker, right?
Yes, for arm64 we just leave a zero word (which can't be a valid token)
above the stack switch token, that does mean you can't exactly tell that
the top of stack marker is there unless there's also a stack switch
token below it.
> It's a good design basic with not a lot of cost.
> I think risc-v should be able to converge on that.
Great.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists