linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86/split_lock: add the source of exception to warning logs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 08:27:34 -0800
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@...cle.com>, x86@...nel.org
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
 dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 joe.jin@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86/split_lock: add the source of exception to
 warning logs

On 2/23/24 01:47, Dongli Zhang wrote:
> @@ -1194,11 +1195,11 @@ static void split_lock_warn(unsigned long ip)
>  bool handle_guest_split_lock(unsigned long ip)
>  {
>  	if (sld_state == sld_warn) {
> -		split_lock_warn(ip);
> +		split_lock_warn(ip, true);
>  		return true;
>  	}

I really despise random true/falses getting passed to functions.

Wouldn't this be a lot easier to read if you just passed the string in:

	split_lock_warn(ip, "guest");

rather than bools plus the ternary form dance?