linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] kselftest: Add basic test for probing the rust sample modules

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 15:02:27 -0700
From: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Laura Nao <laura.nao@...labora.com>, ojeda@...nel.org,
 alex.gaynor@...il.com, wedsonaf@...il.com, shuah@...nel.org
Cc: usama.anjum@...labora.com, a.hindborg@...sung.com, aliceryhl@...gle.com,
 benno.lossin@...ton.me, bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com, boqun.feng@...il.com,
 gary@...yguo.net, kernel@...labora.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
 kernel@...entinobst.de, Sergio Gonzalez Collado <sergio.collado@...il.com>,
 Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] kselftest: Add basic test for probing the rust sample
 modules

On 2/23/24 14:48, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 2/22/24 09:29, Laura Nao wrote:
>> Add new basic kselftest that checks if the available rust sample modules
>> can be added and removed correctly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Laura Nao <laura.nao@...labora.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Sergio Gonzalez Collado <sergio.collado@...il.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>
>> ---
>> Changes in v3:
>> - Removed useless KSFT_PASS, KSFT_FAIL, KSFT_SKIP constants
>> - Used ktap_finished to print the results summary and handle the return code
>> Changes in v2:
>> - Added missing SPDX line
>> - Edited test_probe_samples.sh script to use the common KTAP helpers file
>> ---
>>   MAINTAINERS                                   |  1 +
>>   tools/testing/selftests/Makefile              |  1 +
>>   tools/testing/selftests/rust/Makefile         |  4 +++
>>   .../selftests/rust/test_probe_samples.sh      | 34 +++++++++++++++++++
>>   4 files changed, 40 insertions(+)
>>   create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/rust/Makefile
>>   create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/rust/test_probe_samples.sh
>>
> 
> Looks good to me. Don't you need a config file for this test?
> Refer to config files for existing tests as a reference.
> 
make kselftest TARGETS=rust
or
make run_tests

On Linux 6.8-rc5 give the following? Doesn't look right.
  
TAP version 13
1..1
# timeout set to 45
# selftests: rust: test_probe_samples.sh
# ./test_probe_samples.sh: line 12: /linux/linux_6.8/tools/testing/selftests/rust/../kselftest/ktap_helpers.sh: No such file or directory
# ./test_probe_samples.sh: line 16: ktap_print_header: command not found
# ./test_probe_samples.sh: line 18: ktap_set_plan: command not found
# ./test_probe_samples.sh: line 22: ktap_test_skip: command not found
# ./test_probe_samples.sh: line 22: ktap_test_skip: command not found
# ./test_probe_samples.sh: line 34: ktap_finished: command not found
not ok 1 selftests: rust: test_probe_samples.sh # exit=127

thanks,
-- Shuah