linux-kernel - Re: Recent-ish changes in binfmt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <878r35rkc4.fsf@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 09:35:39 -0600
From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Jan Bujak <j@...a.io>,  Pedro Falcato <pedro.falcato@...il.com>,
  linux-mm@...ck.org,  linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
  viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,  brauner@...nel.org,
  linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Recent-ish changes in binfmt_elf made my program segfault

Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> writes:

> On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 12:23:27AM +0900, Jan Bujak wrote:
>> On 1/22/24 23:54, Pedro Falcato wrote:
>> > Hi!
>> > 
>> > Where did you get that linker script?
>> > 
>> > FWIW, I catched this possible issue in review, and this was already
>> > discussed (see my email and Eric's reply):
>> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAKbZUD3E2if8Sncy+M2YKncc_Zh08-86W6U5wR0ZMazShxbHHA@mail.gmail.com/
>> > 
>> > This was my original testcase
>> > (https://github.com/heatd/elf-bug-questionmark), which convinced the
>> > loader to map .data over a cleared .bss. Your bug seems similar, but
>> > does the inverse: maps .bss over .data.
>> > 
>> 
>> I wrote the linker script myself from scratch.
>
> Do you still need this addressed, or have you been able to adjust the
> linker script? (I ask to try to assess the priority of needing to fix
> this behavior change...)

Kees, I haven't had a chance to test this yet but it occurred to me
that there is an easy way to handle this.  In our in-memory copy
of the elf program headers we can just merge the two segments
together.

I believe the diff below accomplishes that, and should fix issue.

Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>

diff --git a/fs/binfmt_elf.c b/fs/binfmt_elf.c
index 5397b552fbeb..01df7dd1f3b4 100644
--- a/fs/binfmt_elf.c
+++ b/fs/binfmt_elf.c
@@ -924,6 +926,31 @@ static int load_elf_binary(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
 	elf_ppnt = elf_phdata;
 	for (i = 0; i < elf_ex->e_phnum; i++, elf_ppnt++)
 		switch (elf_ppnt->p_type) {
+		case PT_LOAD:
+		{
+			/*
+			 * Historically linux ignored all but the
+			 * final .bss segment.  Now that linux honors
+			 * all .bss segments, a .bss segment that
+			 * logically is not overlapping but is
+			 * overlapping when it's edges are rounded up
+			 * to page size causes programs to fail.
+			 *
+			 * Handle that case by merging .bss segments
+			 * into the segment they follow.
+			 */
+			if (((i + 1) >= elf_ex->e_phnum) ||
+			    (elf_ppnt[1].p_type != PT_LOAD) ||
+			    (elf_ppnt[1].p_filesz != 0))
+				continue;
+			unsigned long end =
+				elf_ppnt[0].p_vaddr + elf_ppnt[0].p_memsz;
+			if (elf_ppnt[1].p_vaddr != end)
+				continue;
+			elf_ppnt[0].p_memsz += elf_ppnt[1].p_memsz;
+			elf_ppnt[1].p_type = PT_NULL;
+			break;
+		}
 		case PT_GNU_STACK:
 			if (elf_ppnt->p_flags & PF_X)
 				executable_stack = EXSTACK_ENABLE_X;