linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 5/9] mm: Initialize struct vm_unmapped_area

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <202402271004.7145FDB53F@keescook>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 10:07:26 -0800
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
Cc: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
	"Liam.Howlett@...cle.com" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
	"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"debug@...osinc.com" <debug@...osinc.com>,
	"broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
	"kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
	"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
	"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
	"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
	"luto@...nel.org" <luto@...nel.org>,
	"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
	"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org" <linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-csky@...r.kernel.org" <linux-csky@...r.kernel.org>,
	"loongarch@...ts.linux.dev" <loongarch@...ts.linux.dev>,
	"linux-mips@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	"linux-s390@...r.kernel.org" <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-sh@...r.kernel.org" <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
	"sparclinux@...r.kernel.org" <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/9] mm: Initialize struct vm_unmapped_area_info

On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 07:02:59AM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> 
> 
> Le 26/02/2024 à 20:09, Rick Edgecombe a écrit :
> > Future changes will need to add a field to struct vm_unmapped_area_info.
> > This would cause trouble for any archs that don't initialize the
> > struct. Currently every user sets each field, so if new fields are
> > added, the core code parsing the struct will see garbage in the new
> > field.
> > 
> > It could be possible to initialize the new field for each arch to 0, but
> > instead simply inialize the field with a C99 struct inializing syntax.
> 
> Why doing a full init of the struct when all fields are re-written a few 
> lines after ?

It's a nice change for robustness and makes future changes easier. It's
not actually wasteful since the compiler will throw away all redundant
stores.

> If I take the exemple of powerpc function slice_find_area_bottomup():
> 
> 	struct vm_unmapped_area_info info;
> 
> 	info.flags = 0;
> 	info.length = len;
> 	info.align_mask = PAGE_MASK & ((1ul << pshift) - 1);
> 	info.align_offset = 0;

But one cleanup that is possible from explicitly zero-initializing the
whole structure would be dropping all the individual "= 0" assignments.
:)

-- 
Kees Cook