[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zd4lggegV2MeD3jP@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 18:10:10 +0000
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@...il.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@...il.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/2] arm64: stacktrace: Implement
arch_bpf_stack_walk() for the BPF JIT
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 06:01:56PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 06:04:35PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 11:28 AM Catalin Marinas
> > <catalin.marinas@....com> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 12:52:24PM +0000, Puranjay Mohan wrote:
> > > > This will be used by bpf_throw() to unwind till the program marked as
> > > > exception boundary and run the callback with the stack of the main
> > > > program.
> > > >
> > > > This is required for supporting BPF exceptions on ARM64.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@...il.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
> [...]
> > > I guess you want this to be merged via the bpf tree?
> >
> > We typically take bpf jit patches through bpf-next, since
> > we do cross arch jits refactoring from time to time,
> > but nothing like this is pending for this merge window,
> > so if you want it to go through arm64 tree that's fine with us.
>
> I don't have any preference. I can add it on top of the other arm64
> patches if there are no dependencies on it from your side.
Actually, it depends on patches in bpf-next AFAICT (it doesn't apply
cleanly on top of vanilla -rc3). So please take the patches through the
bpf tree.
Thanks.
--
Catalin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists