linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/122] 5.10.211-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <cfaa0f4b-f9ef-459e-a174-3062b2d3b514@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 10:58:39 -0800
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
 linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
 lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
 sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de,
 conor@...nel.org, allen.lkml@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/122] 5.10.211-rc1 review

On 2/27/24 05:26, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.211 release.
> There are 122 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Thu, 29 Feb 2024 13:15:36 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.211-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on 
BMIPS_GENERIC:

Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>

Same warning as what Daniel reported for ARM 32-bit:

In file included from ./include/linux/kernel.h:15,
                  from ./include/linux/list.h:9,
                  from ./include/linux/module.h:12,
                  from net/ipv4/arp.c:74:
net/ipv4/arp.c: In function 'arp_req_get':
/include/linux/minmax.h:20:35: warning: comparison of distinct pointer 
types lacks a cast
    20 |         (!!(sizeof((typeof(x) *)1 == (typeof(y) *)1)))
       |                                   ^~
/include/linux/minmax.h:26:18: note: in expansion of macro '__typecheck'
    26 |                 (__typecheck(x, y) && __no_side_effects(x, y))
       |                  ^~~~~~~~~~~
/include/linux/minmax.h:36:31: note: in expansion of macro '__safe_cmp'
    36 |         __builtin_choose_expr(__safe_cmp(x, y), \
       |                               ^~~~~~~~~~
/include/linux/minmax.h:45:25: note: in expansion of macro '__careful_cmp'
    45 | #define min(x, y)       __careful_cmp(x, y, <)
       |                         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
net/ipv4/arp.c:1108:32: note: in expansion of macro 'min'
  1108 |                                min(dev->addr_len, 
sizeof(r->arp_ha.sa_data_min)));
       |                                ^~~

-- 
Florian