[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zd53aNc1aFrCYxFd@codewreck.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 08:59:36 +0900
From: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de,
conor@...nel.org, allen.lkml@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/122] 5.10.211-rc1 review
Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote on Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 02:26:01PM +0100:
> Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> net: dev: Convert sa_data to flexible array in struct sockaddr
> (ca13c2b1e9e4b5d982c2f1e75f28b1586e5c0f7f in this tree,
> b5f0de6df6dce8d641ef58ef7012f3304dffb9a1 upstream)
This commit breaks build of some 3rd party wireless module we use here
(because sizeof(sa->sa_data) no longer works and needs to use
sa_data_min)
With that said I guess it really is a dependency on the arp_req_get
overflow, so probably necessary evil, and I don't think we explicitly
pretend to preserve APIs for 3rd party modules so this is probably
fine... The new warnings that poped up (and were reported in other
messages) a probably worth checking though.
That aside no particular problem actually running this, so--
Tested 5d69d611e74d ("Linux 5.10.211-rc1") on:
- arm i.MX6ULL (Armadillo 640)
- arm64 i.MX8MP (Armadillo G4)
No obvious regression in dmesg or basic tests:
Tested-by: Dominique Martinet <dominique.martinet@...ark-techno.com>
--
Dominique Martinet | Asmadeus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists