linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v6 5/8] net: phy: Immediately call adjust_link if only tx_lpi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 06:35:38 +0100
From: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
	Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@....com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang@....com>, Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>,
	NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>, kernel@...gutronix.de,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 5/8] net: phy: Immediately call adjust_link
 if only tx_lpi_enabled changes

On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 07:59:28PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 05:53:31PM +0000, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 09:50:02AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> > > This is the source of the concern, we don't know which MAC drivers we might
> > > end-up breaking by calling adjust_link(link == 1) twice in a row, hopefully
> > > none, because they should be well written to only update the parameters that
> > > need updating, but who knows?
> > 
> > Just quickly... There are some (I went through a bunch.) They don't
> > support EEE. I haven't been through all though, so there could be
> > some which support EEE and where adjust_link() with phydev->link=true
> > twice in a row could result in badness.
> 
> So i think we all agree the MAC needs to see a down/up, even if the
> link itself never went down. Anything else is too risky and will
> probably break something somewhere.

Means, this patch should be dropped. Are there other changes required?

Regards,
Oleksij
-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |