lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0892593d-0fd9-4381-b2bd-843627bd2723@riseup.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 09:29:58 -0300
From: Arthur Grillo <arthurgrillo@...eup.net>
To: Pekka Paalanen <pekka.paalanen@...labora.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Siqueira <rodrigosiqueiramelo@...il.com>,
 Melissa Wen <melissa.srw@...il.com>, MaĆ­ra Canal
 <mairacanal@...eup.net>, Haneen Mohammed <hamohammed.sa@...il.com>,
 Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
 Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
 Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
 David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
 dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/vkms: Add information on how to benchmark



On 27/02/24 08:55, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 08:44:52 -0300
> Arthur Grillo <arthurgrillo@...eup.net> wrote:
> 
>> On 27/02/24 06:19, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
>>> On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 17:42:11 -0300
>>> Arthur Grillo <arthurgrillo@...eup.net> wrote:
>>>   
>>>> Now that we have a defined benchmark for testing the driver, add
>>>> documentation on how to run it.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Arthur Grillo <arthurgrillo@...eup.net>
>>>> ---
>>>>  Documentation/gpu/vkms.rst | 6 ++++++
>>>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/gpu/vkms.rst b/Documentation/gpu/vkms.rst
>>>> index ba04ac7c2167..6d07f79f77ff 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/gpu/vkms.rst
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/gpu/vkms.rst
>>>> @@ -89,6 +89,12 @@ You can also run subtests if you do not want to run the entire test::
>>>>    sudo ./build/tests/kms_flip --run-subtest basic-plain-flip --device "sys:/sys/devices/platform/vkms"
>>>>    sudo IGT_DEVICE="sys:/sys/devices/platform/vkms" ./build/tests/kms_flip --run-subtest basic-plain-flip
>>>>  
>>>> +If you are developing features that may affect performance, you can run the kms_fb_stress  
>>>
>>> s/can/must/
>>>   
>>>> +benchmark::  
>>>
>>> before and after, and report the numbers.  
>>
>> Did you mean to write the benchmarks logs here?
> 
> I mean people should be required tell their before and after numbers in
> either commit message (my preference) or in series cover letter (if
> benchmarking commits is not useful).
> 
> With the addition of YUV support in VKMS, maybe the benchmark needs to

With the upcoming addition, I've sent a patch to arbitrarily change the
formats on the benchmark via command-line options. It's not adding a new
case, but maybe just this could already help.

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240226-kms_fb_stress-dev-v1-0-1c14942b1244@riseup.net/

Best Regards,
~Arthur Grillo

> start printing YUV numbers separately as a new case.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> pq
> 
>>
>>>   
>>>> +
>>>> +  sudo ./build/benchmarks/kms_fb_stress --device "sys:/sys/devices/platform/vkms"
>>>> +  sudo IGT_DEVICE="sys:/sys/devices/platform/vkms" ./build/benchmarks/kms_fb_stress  
>>>
>>> Do people need to run both commands?  
>>
>> No, they don't, just two options.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> ~Arthur Grillo
>>
>>>
>>> Anyway, a good idea.
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Pekka Paalanen <pekka.paalanen@...labora.com>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> pq
>>>   
>>>> +
>>>>  TODO
>>>>  ====
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> base-commit: eeb8e8d9f124f279e80ae679f4ba6e822ce4f95f
>>>> change-id: 20240226-bench-vkms-5b8b7aab255e
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,  
>>>   
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ