linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] x86/mtrr: Check if fixed MTRRs exist before saving them

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87edcw8925.ffs@tglx>
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 00:26:26 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/mtrr: Check if fixed MTRRs exist before saving them

On Wed, Jan 10 2024 at 07:08, Andi Kleen wrote:
> This one place forgot to check the fixed capability.

This one place forgot? And what the heck is a fixed capability? 

> Otherwise there will a harmless but ugly WARN_ON for the failed WRMSR
> when the MSR doesn't exist.

This is not a sentence as it lacks a verb,

Also it does not matter whether you think that the WARN_ON() is ugly or
not. Can you please write a changelog in technical terms?

> Noticed when testing X86S support.

Who cares?

> Fixes: 2b1f6278d77c ("[PATCH] x86: Save the MTRRs of the BSP before")

This fixes tag is pointlessly truncated. The correct one is:

Fixes: 2b1f6278d77c ("[PATCH] x86: Save the MTRRs of the BSP before booting an AP")

It's not rocket science to copy & pasta correctly.

Thanks,

        tglx