lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e2b0b8e3-9b39-4621-9e43-d7de02286a27@molgen.mpg.de>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 12:03:56 +0100
From: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Ban Feng <baneric926@...il.com>, jdelvare@...e.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
 krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, corbet@....net,
 linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 kcfeng0@...oton.com, kwliu@...oton.com, openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org,
 linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 DELPHINE_CHIU@...ynn.com, naresh.solanki@...ements.com,
 billy_tsai@...eedtech.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] hwmon: Driver for Nuvoton NCT7363Y

Dear Guenter,


Am 28.02.24 um 10:03 schrieb Guenter Roeck:
> On 2/27/24 23:57, Paul Menzel wrote:

>> Am 27.02.24 um 01:56 schrieb baneric926@...il.com:
>>> From: Ban Feng <kcfeng0@...oton.com>
>>>
>>> NCT7363Y is an I2C based hardware monitoring chip from Nuvoton.
>>
>> Please reference the datasheet.
> 
> Note that something like
> 
> Datasheet: Available from Nuvoton upon request
> 
> is quite common for hardware monitoring chips and acceptable.

Yes, it would be nice to document it though. (And finally for vendors to 
just make them available for download.)

>> Could you please give a high level description of the driver design?
> 
> Can you be more specific ? I didn't have time yet to look into details,
> but at first glance this looks like a standard hardware monitoring driver.
> One could argue that the high level design of such drivers is described
> in Documentation/hwmon/hwmon-kernel-api.rst.
> 
> I don't usually ask for a additional design information for hwmon drivers
> unless some chip interaction is unusual and needs to be explained,
> and then I prefer to have it explained in the code. Given that, I am
> quite curious and would like to understand what you are looking for.
For a 10+ lines commit, in my opinion the commit message should say 
something about the implementation. Even it is just, as you wrote, a 
note, that it follows the standard design.


Kind regards,

Paul

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ