linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] AppArmor: Fix lsm_get_self

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240228.iuBae3aiS6oo@digikod.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 13:53:42 +0100
From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
To: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
Cc: John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>, 
	Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>, 
	"Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] AppArmor: Fix lsm_get_self_attr()

On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 05:13:58PM -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 5:09 PM Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 11:01 AM Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 2:59 PM Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com> wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 4:07 PM Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com> wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 2:06 PM Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > aa_getprocattr() may not initialize the value's pointer in some case.
> > > > > > As for proc_pid_attr_read(), initialize this pointer to NULL in
> > > > > > apparmor_getselfattr() to avoid an UAF in the kfree() call.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cc: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
> > > > > > Cc: John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>
> > > > > > Cc: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
> > > > > > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> > > > > > Fixes: 223981db9baf ("AppArmor: Add selfattr hooks")
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > >  security/apparmor/lsm.c | 2 +-
> > > > > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > If you like John, I can send this up to Linus with the related SELinux
> > > > > fix, I would just need an ACK from you.
> > > >
> > > > Reviewed-by: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
> > > >
> > > > This patch looks good to me, and while we've still got at least two
> > > > (maybe three?) more weeks before v6.8 is tagged, I think it would be
> > > > good to get this up to Linus ASAP.  I'll hold off for another day, but
> > > > if we don't see any comment from John I'll go ahead and merge this and
> > > > send it up to Linus with the SELinux fix; I'm sure John wouldn't be
> > > > happy if v6.8 went out the door without this fix.
> > >
> > > I just merged this into lsm/stable-6.8 and once the automated
> > > build/test has done it's thing and come back clean I'll send this,
> > > along with the associated SELinux fix, up to Linus.  Thanks all.
> >
> > In off-list discussions with Mickaël today it was noted that this
> > patch also needs a fixup to the commit description so I've replaced it
> > with the following:
> >
> >   "In apparmor_getselfattr() when an invalid AppArmor
> >    attribute is requested, or a value hasn't been explicitly
> >    set for the requested attribute, the label passed to
> >    aa_put_label() is not properly initialized which can cause
> >    problems when the pointer value is non-NULL and AppArmor
> >    attempts to drop a reference on the bogus label object."
> >
> > I've updated the commit in lsm/stable-6.8 and I'll be sending it to
> > Linus shortly.
> >
> > > John, if this commit is problematic please let me know and I'll send a
> > > fix or a revert.
> 
> I also just realized that both this patch and the SELinux have the
> stable kernel marking which shouldn't be necessary as the LSM syscalls
> are only present in the v6.8-rcX kernels.  I'm going to drop the
> stable tagging, but leave the 'Fixes:' tag of course.

Looks good, thanks!

> 
> -- 
> paul-moore.com
>