[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2e8ff010-2129-55e0-55b7-5a1589d27798@quicinc.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 20:41:22 +0530
From: Krishna Chaitanya Chundru <quic_krichai@...cinc.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
CC: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio
<konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof WilczyĆski <kw@...ux.com>,
Rob Herring
<robh@...nel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring
<robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>,
Brian Masney
<bmasney@...hat.com>, Georgi Djakov <djakov@...nel.org>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<vireshk@...nel.org>, <quic_vbadigan@...cinc.com>,
<quic_skananth@...cinc.com>, <quic_nitegupt@...cinc.com>,
<quic_parass@...cinc.com>,
Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/7] PCI: qcom: Add ICC bandwidth vote for CPU to PCIe
path
On 2/28/2024 8:20 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 12:08:37PM +0530, Krishna Chaitanya Chundru wrote:
>> On 2/28/2024 4:52 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 08:18:00PM +0530, Krishna chaitanya chundru wrote:
>>>> To access PCIe registers, PCIe BAR space, config space the CPU-PCIe
>>>> ICC(interconnect consumers) path should be voted otherwise it may
>>>> lead to NoC(Network on chip) timeout. We are surviving because of
>>>> other driver vote for this path.
>>>> As there is less access on this path compared to PCIe to mem path
>>>> add minimum vote i.e 1KBps bandwidth always.
>
>>>> + * The config space, BAR space and registers goes through cpu-pcie path.
>>>> + * Set peak bandwidth to 1KBps as recommended by HW team for this path all the time.
>>>
>>> Wrap to fit in 80 columns.
>
>> We have limit up to 100 columns in the driver right, I am ok to change to 80
>> but just checking if I misunderstood something.
>
> I should have said "wrap to fit in 80 columns to match the rest of the
> file." I looked at pcie-qcom.c, and with a few minor exceptions, it
> fits in 80 columns, and maintaining that consistency makes it easier
> to browse. Sometimes exceptions make sense for code, but for
> comments, having some that fit in 80 columns and some that require 100
> just makes life harder.
>
> Bjorn
>
Sure I will wrap in 80 columns, in my next patch series.
- Krishna Chaitanya.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists