[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZeDdMJlxBL4SGkws@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810>
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 14:38:24 -0500
From: Frank Li <Frank.li@....com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com>, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] ASoC: dt-bindings: fsl-sai: allow only one
dma-names
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 06:57:29PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 06:55:58PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 03:54:11PM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> > > Some sai only connect one direction. So allow only "rx" or "tx" for
> > > dma-names.
> >
> > Which sai? Can you restrict this per compatible please, so that someone
> > cannot add 2 dmas for ones where only the tx is supported.
> >
> > | dmas:
> > | minItems: 1
> > | items:
> > | - description: DMA controller phandle and request line for RX
> > | - description: DMA controller phandle and request line for TX
> >
> > The binding already allows only one, but it documents that the first dma
> > is always the RX dma, and that doesn't change with this patch..
>
> I said "doesn't change" - but I don't think you can change this
> trivially, as something could rely on the first dma being the rx one.
> You'd have to check that there is nothing using these using indices
> rather than names before making any changes here.
Linux driver and dts with tx only work well. Only issue is dtb_check will
report error. I want to eliminate these DTB_CHECK warning.
And it also reasonable, only rx or tx for a special SAI.
Can we remove 'description'? dmas should already descripted at common place
and 'RX' and 'TX' are listed at 'dma-names'
Frank
>
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Conor.
> >
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>
> > > ---
> > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl,sai.yaml | 12 ++++++++----
> > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl,sai.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl,sai.yaml
> > > index 2456d958adeef..0302752d58a2b 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl,sai.yaml
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl,sai.yaml
> > > @@ -86,10 +86,14 @@ properties:
> > > - description: DMA controller phandle and request line for TX
> > >
> > > dma-names:
> > > - minItems: 1
> > > - items:
> > > - - const: rx
> > > - - const: tx
> > > + oneOf:
> > > + - items:
> > > + - const: rx
> > > + - const: tx
> > > + - items:
> > > + - enum:
> > > + - rx
> > > + - tx
> > >
> > > interrupts:
> > > items:
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.34.1
> > >
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists