[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240301-crudeness-resale-3c0a1228850d@spud>
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2024 16:05:25 +0000
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Frank Li <Frank.li@....com>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com>, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] ASoC: dt-bindings: fsl-sai: allow only one
dma-names
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 02:38:24PM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 06:57:29PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 06:55:58PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 03:54:11PM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> > > > Some sai only connect one direction. So allow only "rx" or "tx" for
> > > > dma-names.
> > >
> > > Which sai? Can you restrict this per compatible please, so that someone
> > > cannot add 2 dmas for ones where only the tx is supported.
> > >
> > > | dmas:
> > > | minItems: 1
> > > | items:
> > > | - description: DMA controller phandle and request line for RX
> > > | - description: DMA controller phandle and request line for TX
> > >
> > > The binding already allows only one, but it documents that the first dma
> > > is always the RX dma, and that doesn't change with this patch..
> >
> > I said "doesn't change" - but I don't think you can change this
> > trivially, as something could rely on the first dma being the rx one.
> > You'd have to check that there is nothing using these using indices
> > rather than names before making any changes here.
>
> Linux driver and dts with tx only work well. Only issue is dtb_check will
> report error. I want to eliminate these DTB_CHECK warning.
Linux is not the only user of these bindings, citing linux as your
evidence here is only sufficient if no other users exist. Do they?
> And it also reasonable, only rx or tx for a special SAI.
>
> Can we remove 'description'? dmas should already descripted at common place
> and 'RX' and 'TX' are listed at 'dma-names'
Removing the description has the same problem. The existing binding has
set a fixed order that you now want to make flexible.
Thanks,
Conor.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists