linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6] dt-bindings: gpio: aspeed,ast2400-gpio: Convert to DT schema

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2024 09:53:36 +1030
From: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...econstruct.com.au>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>, 
 linus.walleij@...aro.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
 robh+dt@...nel.org,  conor+dt@...nel.org, joel@....id.au,
 linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,  devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,  linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] dt-bindings: gpio: aspeed,ast2400-gpio: Convert to
 DT schema

On Thu, 2024-02-29 at 09:52 +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 4:21 AM Andrew Jeffery
> <andrew@...econstruct.com.au> wrote:
> > 
> > On Wed, 2024-02-28 at 08:47 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > 
> > > You still have way too many examples. One is enough, two is still okay.
> > > We really do not want more of examples with minor differences.
> > 
> > Noted, I'll keep them to a minimum in the future.
> > 
> 
> As in: I'll still send a v7? I can trim the examples when applying,
> just tell me which ones to drop.

Ah, thanks. I wasn't planning to send a v7 given the R-b tag from
Krzysztof for v6. I intended for "in the future" to mean for patches
converting other bindings to DT schema. But if you're keen to trim some
examples out I'd drop the aspeed,ast2400-gpio and aspeed,ast2500-gpio
nodes, keeping just the aspeed,ast2600-gpio example.

Andrew