[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=Mfa1uUhkPNpLdcMsGC4=G+_MGzaxXRL7UVdfKJD_zF0+w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2024 09:18:01 +0100
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...econstruct.com.au>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
joel@....id.au, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] dt-bindings: gpio: aspeed,ast2400-gpio: Convert to DT schema
On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 12:23 AM Andrew Jeffery
<andrew@...econstruct.com.au> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2024-02-29 at 09:52 +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 4:21 AM Andrew Jeffery
> > <andrew@...econstruct.com.au> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2024-02-28 at 08:47 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > >
> > > > You still have way too many examples. One is enough, two is still okay.
> > > > We really do not want more of examples with minor differences.
> > >
> > > Noted, I'll keep them to a minimum in the future.
> > >
> >
> > As in: I'll still send a v7? I can trim the examples when applying,
> > just tell me which ones to drop.
>
> Ah, thanks. I wasn't planning to send a v7 given the R-b tag from
> Krzysztof for v6. I intended for "in the future" to mean for patches
> converting other bindings to DT schema. But if you're keen to trim some
> examples out I'd drop the aspeed,ast2400-gpio and aspeed,ast2500-gpio
> nodes, keeping just the aspeed,ast2600-gpio example.
>
> Andrew
It's ok, I applied it as is.
Bart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists