linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kunit-next tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b0abafb8-65c8-4e54-a410-8a5ac7dccee6@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2024 15:30:17 -0700
From: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
 Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
 Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
 DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
 Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
 Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@...el.com>,
 Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
 Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>, Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kunit-next tree

Hi Stephen,

On 3/1/24 13:46, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Shuah,
> 
> On Fri, 1 Mar 2024 09:05:57 -0700 Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 3/1/24 03:43, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> On Fri, 1 Mar 2024 15:15:02 +0800 David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 at 23:07, Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I can carry the fix through kselftest kunit if it works
>>>>> for all.
>>>>
>>>> I'm happy for this to go in with the KUnit changes if that's the best
>>>> way to keep all of the printk formatting fixes together.
> 
> Unfortunately you can't fix this in the kunit-next tree without pulling
> in Linus' tree (or the drm-fixes tree) - which seems excessive.
>    
>>> I am pretty sure that the proper fix has been applied to the
>>> drm-fixes tree today (in the merge of the drm-misc-fixes tree).
>>>    
>>
>> What's the commit id for this fix? I Would like to include the details
>> in my pull request to Linus.
> 
> My mistake, I misread the merge commit.  It has not been fixed in the
> drm-misc-fixes tree or the drm-fixes tree (or Linus' tree since the
> drm-fixes tree has been merged there) :-(
> 
> The problem in this case is not with the format string types, but with
> a missing argument i.e. there is another argument required by the
> format string.  It really should be fixed in the drm-misc-fixes tree
> and sent to Linus post haste.
> 
> At least the change in the kunit-next tree will stop this happening in
> the future.
> 

Thank you for looking into it.

David, please send a fix in as you suggested earlier. I will apply
it to avoid compile errors.

thanks,
-- Shuah