lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a8ebe39b28a34c3544481a4e43e61d2b@manjaro.org>
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2024 07:17:41 +0100
From: Dragan Simic <dsimic@...jaro.org>
To: Alexey Charkov <alchark@...il.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski
 <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, Daniel Lezcano
 <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, Chen-Yu
 Tsai <wens@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] arm64: dts: rockchip: enable automatic active
 cooling on Rock 5B

On 2024-03-01 06:21, Alexey Charkov wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 1:25 AM Dragan Simic <dsimic@...jaro.org> wrote:
>> On 2024-02-29 20:26, Alexey Charkov wrote:
>> > This links the PWM fan on Radxa Rock 5B as an active cooling device
>> > managed automatically by the thermal subsystem, with a target SoC
>> > temperature of 65C and a minimum-spin interval from 55C to 65C to
>> > ensure airflow when the system gets warm
>> 
>> I'd suggest that you replace "automatic active cooling" with "active
>> cooling" in the patch subject.  I know, it may seem like more of the
>> unnecessary nitpicking, :) but I hope you'll agree that "automatic"
>> is actually redundant there.  It would also make the patch subject
>> a bit shorter.
>> 
>> Another option would be to replace "automatic active cooling" with
>> "automatic fan control", which may actually be a better choice.
>> I'd be happy with whichever one you prefer. :)
> 
> Sounds good to me, thanks!

I'm glad that you like it. :)

>> Otherwise, please feel free to add:
>> 
>> Reviewed-by: Dragan Simic <dsimic@...jaro.org>
> 
> Thank you Dragan, much appreciated!

Thank you for putting up with my nitpicking. :)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ