[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZeGV_siWFkfqSEgZ@kekkonen.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2024 08:46:54 +0000
From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...asonboard.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: i2c: ds90ub960: Delete duplicate source code in
ub960_parse_dt_rxports()
Hi Markus,
On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 08:46:25AM +0100, Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2024 08:23:24 +0100
>
> Avoid the specification of a duplicate fwnode_handle_put() call
> in this function implementation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> ---
> drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c | 5 +----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c
> index ffe5f25f8647..eb708ed7b56e 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c
> @@ -3486,10 +3486,7 @@ static int ub960_parse_dt_rxports(struct ub960_data *priv)
> }
> }
>
> - fwnode_handle_put(links_fwnode);
> -
> - return 0;
> -
> + ret = 0;
I think it'd be nicer to initialise ret as zero, then you can just drop the
assignment above.
> err_put_links:
> fwnode_handle_put(links_fwnode);
>
--
Regards,
Sakari Ailus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists