linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 02/11] dt-bindings: hwmon: lm75: use common hwmon schema

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <CZIH21XQPA24.17TEKSPWLL7KR@bootlin.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2024 15:09:50 +0100
From: Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@...tlin.com>
To: "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>, "Guenter Roeck"
 <linux@...ck-us.net>, "Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, "Andi
 Shyti" <andi.shyti@...nel.org>, "Rob Herring" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
 "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, "Conor Dooley"
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, "Thomas Bogendoerfer" <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
 <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>, "Gregory Clement"
 <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>, "Vladimir Kondratiev"
 <vladimir.kondratiev@...ileye.com>, "Thomas Petazzoni"
 <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>, "Tawfik Bayouk"
 <tawfik.bayouk@...ileye.com>, "Jean Delvare" <jdelvare@...e.com>,
 <linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/11] dt-bindings: hwmon: lm75: use common hwmon
 schema

Hello,

On Fri Mar 1, 2024 at 12:35 PM CET, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 01/03/2024 11:44, Théo Lebrun wrote:
> > On Fri Mar 1, 2024 at 11:13 AM CET, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> On 01/03/2024 10:41, Théo Lebrun wrote:
> >>> On Fri Mar 1, 2024 at 7:53 AM CET, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >>>> On 2/29/24 22:37, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >>>>> On 29/02/2024 19:10, Théo Lebrun wrote:
> >>>>>> Reference common hwmon schema which has the generic "label" property,
> >>>>>> parsed by Linux hwmon subsystem.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please do not mix independent patchsets. You create unneeded
> >>>>> dependencies blocking this patch. This patch depends on hwmon work, so
> >>>>> it cannot go through different tree.
> >>>
> >>> I had to pick between this or dtbs_check failing on my DTS that uses a
> >>> label on temperature-sensor@48.
> >>
> >> I don't see how is that relevant. You can organize your branches as you
> >> wish, e.g. base one b4 branch on another and you will not have any warnings.
> > 
> > That is what I do, I however do not want mips-next to have errors when
> > running dtbs_check. Having dtbs_check return errors is not an issue?
>
> You should ask your maintainer, but I don't understand how this is
> achievable anyway. Subsystem bindings *should not* go via MIPS-next, so
> how are you going to solve this?

I thought it'd go in hwmon-next and be picked up by mips-next as well.
It's clear now that the right approach is to send the lm75.yaml patch
alone.

I'll wait some more before sending a new revision that drops this
lm75.yaml patch.

Have a nice day,

--
Théo Lebrun, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com