[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3383421b-bda2-48c5-bc49-d3d9f2ecfe25@roeck-us.net>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2024 09:00:41 -0800
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Naresh Solanki <naresh.solanki@...ements.com>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>
Cc: mazziesaccount@...il.com, Patrick Rudolph
<patrick.rudolph@...ements.com>, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] hwmon: (pmbus/mp2975) Fix IRQ masking
On 3/4/24 08:44, Naresh Solanki wrote:
> From: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@...ements.com>
>
> The MP2971/MP2973 use a custom 16bit register format for
> SMBALERT_MASK which doesn't follow the PMBUS specification.
>
> Map the PMBUS defined bits used by the common code onto the custom
> format used by MPS and since the SMBALERT_MASK is currently never read
> by common code only implement the mapping for write transactions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@...ements.com>
> Signed-off-by: Naresh Solanki <naresh.solanki@...ements.com>
> ---
What will it take for people to start providing change logs ?
Why is that do difficult, and why do people seem to assume that
I have the time to look up old e-mail chains ?
I'll have to write some boilerplate reply. Until I get to do that,
I'll simply ignore patches without change logs (which I will do
once I have the boilerplate as well, only then it will look nicer).
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists