[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240304205005.10078-3-W_Armin@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2024 21:50:03 +0100
From: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@....de>
To: Shyam-sundar.S-k@....com
Cc: hdegoede@...hat.com,
ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/4] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Do not use readl() for policy buffer access
The policy buffer is allocated using normal memory allocation
functions, so readl() should not be used on it.
Compile-tested only.
Fixes: 7c45534afa44 ("platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add support for PMF Policy Binary")
Signed-off-by: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@....de>
---
drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
index 13dd4462e1e3..58ec2c9606e1 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
@@ -249,8 +249,8 @@ static int amd_pmf_start_policy_engine(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
u32 cookie, length;
int res;
- cookie = readl(dev->policy_buf + POLICY_COOKIE_OFFSET);
- length = readl(dev->policy_buf + POLICY_COOKIE_LEN);
+ cookie = *(u32 *)(dev->policy_buf + POLICY_COOKIE_OFFSET);
+ length = *(u32 *)(dev->policy_buf + POLICY_COOKIE_LEN);
if (cookie != POLICY_SIGN_COOKIE || !length)
return -EINVAL;
--
2.39.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists