linux-kernel - [PATCH v3 3/4] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Use struct for cookie header

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20240304205005.10078-4-W_Armin@gmx.de>
Date: Mon,  4 Mar 2024 21:50:04 +0100
From: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@....de>
To: Shyam-sundar.S-k@....com
Cc: hdegoede@...hat.com,
	ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com,
	platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 3/4] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Use struct for cookie header

The cookie header consists of a sign field and a length field.
Combine both in a single struct to make accesses simpler.

Compile-tested only.

Suggested-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@....de>
---
 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h    | 6 +++++-
 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c | 9 ++++-----
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
index bcf777a5659a..0c90805dc85b 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
@@ -17,7 +17,11 @@
 #define POLICY_BUF_MAX_SZ		0x4b000
 #define POLICY_SIGN_COOKIE		0x31535024
 #define POLICY_COOKIE_OFFSET		0x10
-#define POLICY_COOKIE_LEN		0x14
+
+struct cookie_header {
+	u32 sign;
+	u32 length;
+} __packed;

 /* APMF Functions */
 #define APMF_FUNC_VERIFY_INTERFACE			0
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
index 58ec2c9606e1..71ea7eefc211 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
@@ -246,17 +246,16 @@ static void amd_pmf_invoke_cmd(struct work_struct *work)

 static int amd_pmf_start_policy_engine(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
 {
-	u32 cookie, length;
+	struct cookie_header *header;
 	int res;

-	cookie = *(u32 *)(dev->policy_buf + POLICY_COOKIE_OFFSET);
-	length = *(u32 *)(dev->policy_buf + POLICY_COOKIE_LEN);
+	header = (struct cookie_header *)(dev->policy_buf + POLICY_COOKIE_OFFSET);

-	if (cookie != POLICY_SIGN_COOKIE || !length)
+	if (header->sign != POLICY_SIGN_COOKIE || !header->length)
 		return -EINVAL;

 	/* Update the actual length */
-	dev->policy_sz = length + 512;
+	dev->policy_sz = header->length + 512;
 	res = amd_pmf_invoke_cmd_init(dev);
 	if (res == TA_PMF_TYPE_SUCCESS) {
 		/* Now its safe to announce that smart pc is enabled */
--
2.39.2