linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8195: Add missing gce-client-reg to vpp/vdosys

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <22110872-8915-43cc-b074-112644b16e3b@collabora.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2024 11:16:34 +0100
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@...labora.com>
Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 Allen-KH Cheng <allen-kh.cheng@...iatek.com>,
 Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@...iatek.com>,
 "Jason-JH.Lin" <jason-jh.lin@...iatek.com>,
 "Nancy.Lin" <nancy.lin@...iatek.com>, kernel@...labora.com,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8195: Add missing
 gce-client-reg to vpp/vdosys

Il 01/03/24 15:39, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado ha scritto:
> On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 09:50:31AM +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
>> Il 29/02/24 20:44, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado ha scritto:
>>> Add the missing mediatek,gce-client-reg property to the vppsys and
>>> vdosys nodes to allow them to use the GCE. This prevents the "can't
>>> parse gce-client-reg property" error from being printed and should
>>> result in better performance.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 6aa5b46d1755 ("arm64: dts: mt8195: Add vdosys and vppsys clock nodes")
>>> Suggested-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@...labora.com>
>>
>> Can you please squash patches 2,3,4 in a single one?
>>
>> It doesn't make a lot of sense to have them separated in this case, only
>> generates commit noise for no practical reason imo.
>>
>> arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8195: Add missing gce-client-reg to vpp/vdo/mutex
> 
> I split them like this so that each has its own fixes tag and can all be easily
> backported (as mentioned in the cover letter). That said, the commits fixed in 2
> and 3 both landed in v6.1-rc1, so they could be squashed and still easily
> backported. But the commit fixed in patch 4 only landed in v6.4-rc1, so if we
> squash them all together, the first two won't be backported to v6.1.
> 
> Let me know how you want to proceed.
> 

Oh, I'm sorry I didn't notice that. Ignore my previous comment then, I'll take
those for the next fixes round as-is.

Cheers,
Angelo