linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] net: hsr: Use full string description when opening HSR network device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8d92dcbb-828d-17f4-d199-c625505e7b0c@ti.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2024 16:02:48 +0530
From: Ravi Gunasekaran <r-gunasekaran@...com>
To: Lukasz Majewski <lukma@...x.de>, Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
CC: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <Tristram.Ha@...rochip.com>,
        "Sebastian Andrzej
 Siewior" <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        "Nikita
 Zhandarovich" <n.zhandarovich@...tech.ru>,
        Murali Karicheri
	<m-karicheri2@...com>,
        Ziyang Xuan <william.xuanziyang@...wei.com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ravi Gunasekaran <r-gunasekaran@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: hsr: Use full string description when opening HSR
 network device



On 3/4/24 3:02 PM, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> Up till now only single character ('A' or 'B') was used to provide
> information of HSR slave network device status.
> 
> As it is also possible and valid, that Interlink network device may
> be supported as well, the description must be more verbose. As a result
> the full string description is now used.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <lukma@...x.de>
> ---
>  net/hsr/hsr_device.c | 13 ++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/hsr/hsr_device.c b/net/hsr/hsr_device.c
> index 9d71b66183da..9a60489fba96 100644
> --- a/net/hsr/hsr_device.c
> +++ b/net/hsr/hsr_device.c
> @@ -142,30 +142,29 @@ static int hsr_dev_open(struct net_device *dev)
>  {
>  	struct hsr_priv *hsr;
>  	struct hsr_port *port;
> -	char designation;
> +	char *designation = NULL;
>  
>  	hsr = netdev_priv(dev);
> -	designation = '\0';
>  
>  	hsr_for_each_port(hsr, port) {
>  		if (port->type == HSR_PT_MASTER)
>  			continue;
>  		switch (port->type) {
>  		case HSR_PT_SLAVE_A:
> -			designation = 'A';
> +			designation = "Slave A";

"designation" is now a pointer and is being assigned value
without even allocating memory for it.

>  			break;
>  		case HSR_PT_SLAVE_B:
> -			designation = 'B';
> +			designation = "Slave B";
>  			break;
>  		default:
> -			designation = '?';
> +			designation = "Unknown";
>  		}
>  		if (!is_slave_up(port->dev))
> -			netdev_warn(dev, "Slave %c (%s) is not up; please bring it up to get a fully working HSR network\n",
> +			netdev_warn(dev, "%s (%s) is not up; please bring it up to get a fully working HSR network\n",
>  				    designation, port->dev->name);
>  	}
>  
> -	if (designation == '\0')
> +	if (!designation)
>  		netdev_warn(dev, "No slave devices configured\n");
>  
>  	return 0;

-- 
Regards,
Ravi