linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] ASoC: dt-bindings: fsl,imx-asrc/spdif: Add power-domains requirement

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7925ce69-0cc6-45cb-851e-75a9f19f883b@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2024 16:05:07 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Frank Li <Frank.li@....com>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
 Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
 Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
 Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com>,
 linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 imx@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] ASoC: dt-bindings: fsl,imx-asrc/spdif: Add
 power-domains requirement

On 01/03/2024 16:42, Frank Li wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 07:30:10AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 01/03/2024 05:01, Frank Li wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 10:44:20AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On 28/02/2024 20:14, Frank Li wrote:
>>>>> Add power-domains property for asrc and spdif.
>>>>
>>>> Why?
>>>
>>> i.MX8QXP i.MX8DXL and i.MX8QM need it.
>>
>> Where is it explained in the commit msg? What about other devices/variants?
> 
> I will add it. These patches are for imx8qxp\imx8dxl\imx8qm only. If other
> platform have problem, it should be fixed by new patch. 

I would assume more responsible approach from NXP, not just "their
problem", but anyway that's not what the comment is. Why do you say all
the variants have power domains in one commit, but now in email says
that they might not have? All your patches are vague in this aspect.

Best regards,
Krzysztof