linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] ASoC: dt-bindings: fsl,imx-asrc/spdif: Add power-domains requirement

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2024 10:39:37 -0500
From: Frank Li <Frank.li@....com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
	Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com>, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] ASoC: dt-bindings: fsl,imx-asrc/spdif: Add
 power-domains requirement

On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 04:05:07PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 01/03/2024 16:42, Frank Li wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 07:30:10AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> On 01/03/2024 05:01, Frank Li wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 10:44:20AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >>>> On 28/02/2024 20:14, Frank Li wrote:
> >>>>> Add power-domains property for asrc and spdif.
> >>>>
> >>>> Why?
> >>>
> >>> i.MX8QXP i.MX8DXL and i.MX8QM need it.
> >>
> >> Where is it explained in the commit msg? What about other devices/variants?
> > 
> > I will add it. These patches are for imx8qxp\imx8dxl\imx8qm only. If other
> > platform have problem, it should be fixed by new patch. 
> 
> I would assume more responsible approach from NXP, not just "their
> problem", but anyway that's not what the comment is. Why do you say all
> the variants have power domains in one commit, but now in email says
> that they might not have? All your patches are vague in this aspect.

I am not means "their problem". What's I said is one patch just fix one
thing. If need additional fix,  I can create a new patches. I have not said
all need power domains specifically. If there are some words that let me
think all variant need power domain, please let me where, I can improve it.

Frank
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>