| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID:
<SE2P216MB2102DA0C880653E08D03747383222@SE2P216MB2102.KORP216.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 02:28:31 +0000
From: Kyeongrho.Kim <kr.kim@...highmemory.com>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
CC: "richard@....at" <richard@....at>, "vigneshr@...com" <vigneshr@...com>,
"mmkurbanov@...utedevices.com" <mmkurbanov@...utedevices.com>,
"ddrokosov@...rdevices.ru" <ddrokosov@...rdevices.ru>, Kyeongrho.Kim
<kr.kim@...highmemory.com>, "gch981213@...il.com" <gch981213@...il.com>,
"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Mohamed Sardi
<moh.sardi@...highmemory.com>, Changsub.Shim
<changsub.shim@...highmemory.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Skyhighmemory
Hello Miquel,
Please find the reply in below.
I tried to send an email using 'git send-email', but '5.1.3 Invalid address' error is occurring, so I send it to Outlook first.
Please help me solve this problem.
Thanks,
KR
-----Original Message-----
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2024 6:02 PM
To: Kyeongrho.Kim <kr.kim@...highmemory.com>
Cc: richard@....at; vigneshr@...com; Mohamed Sardi <moh.sardi@...highmemory.com>; Changsub.Shim <changsub.shim@...highmemory.com>; linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Skyhighmemory
Hello Kim,
Thanks for your contribution, a few comments below.
First, please consider always adding the relevant Maintainers and List in Copy, I already reviewed the patch so here is my answer, but next time I will not answer if you send another message in private.
kr.kim@...highmemory.com<mailto:kr.kim@...highmemory.com> wrote on Fri, 23 Feb 2024 15:35:22 +0900:
> From: “Kyeongrho <kr.kim@...highmemory.com<mailto:kr.kim@...highmemory.com>>
Please write a commit log and fix the commit title.
> Signed-off-by: “Kyeongrho <kr.kim@...highmemory.com<mailto:kr.kim@...highmemory.com>>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/spi/Makefile | 2 +-
> drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c | 7 +-
> drivers/mtd/nand/spi/skyhigh.c | 191 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/mtd/spinand.h | 3 +
> 4 files changed, 201 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) mode change
> 100644 => 100755 drivers/mtd/nand/spi/Makefile mode change 100644 =>
> 100755 drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c create mode 100644
> drivers/mtd/nand/spi/skyhigh.c mode change 100644 => 100755
> include/linux/mtd/spinand.h
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/Makefile
> b/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/Makefile old mode 100644 new mode 100755 index
> 19cc77288ebb..48b429d90460
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/Makefile
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> spinand-objs := core.o alliancememory.o ato.o esmt.o foresee.o
> gigadevice.o macronix.o -spinand-objs += micron.o paragon.o toshiba.o
> winbond.o xtx.o
> +spinand-objs += micron.o paragon.o toshiba.o winbond.o xtx.o
> +skyhigh.o
Please keep the alphabetical ordering.
Yes, it is update like below.
+spinand-objs += micron.o paragon.o skyhigh.o toshiba.o winbond.o xtx.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_SPI_NAND) += spinand.o diff --git
> a/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c old mode
> 100644 new mode 100755 index e0b6715e5dfe..e3f0a7544ba4
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c
> @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ static int spinand_read_reg_op(struct spinand_device *spinand, u8 reg, u8 *val)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int spinand_write_reg_op(struct spinand_device *spinand, u8
> reg, u8 val)
> +int spinand_write_reg_op(struct spinand_device *spinand, u8 reg, u8
> +val)
If this is really needed, please do it in a preparation patch. But TBH I'm not really sure it is needed.
That function is needed because it is called by "skyhigh.c".
> {
> struct spi_mem_op op = SPINAND_SET_FEATURE_OP(reg,
> spinand->scratchbuf);
> @@ -196,6 +196,10 @@ static int spinand_init_quad_enable(struct
> spinand_device *spinand) static int spinand_ecc_enable(struct spinand_device *spinand,
> bool enable)
> {
> + /* SHM : always ECC enable */
> + if (spinand->flags & SPINAND_ON_DIE_ECC_MANDATORY)
> + return 0;
> +
Can you please move this logic to your vendor driver?
SHM's SPI Nand must have “ECC Always on” applied.
However, I think there is no way to be moved to the vendor driver.
> return spinand_upd_cfg(spinand, CFG_ECC_ENABLE,
> enable ? CFG_ECC_ENABLE : 0); } @@ -945,6 +949,7 @@ static
> const struct spinand_manufacturer *spinand_manufacturers[] = {
> ¯onix_spinand_manufacturer,
> µn_spinand_manufacturer,
> ¶gon_spinand_manufacturer,
> + &skyhigh_spinand_manufacturer,
> &toshiba_spinand_manufacturer,
> &winbond_spinand_manufacturer,
> &xtx_spinand_manufacturer,
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/skyhigh.c
> b/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/skyhigh.c new file mode 100644 index
> 000000000000..71de4fa34406
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/skyhigh.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,191 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2022 SkyHigh Memory Limited
> + *
> + * Author: Takahiro Kuwano <takahiro.kuwano@...ineon.com<mailto:takahiro.kuwano@...ineon.com>> */
> +
> +#include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/mtd/spinand.h>
> +
> +#define SPINAND_MFR_SKYHIGH 0x01
> +
> +#define SKYHIGH_STATUS_ECC_1TO2_BITFLIPS (1 << 4)
> +#define SKYHIGH_STATUS_ECC_3TO4_BITFLIPS (2 << 4)
> +#define SKYHIGH_STATUS_ECC_5TO6_BITFLIPS (3 << 4)
> +
> +#define SKYHIGH_CONFIG_PROTECT_EN BIT(1)
> +
> +static SPINAND_OP_VARIANTS(read_cache_variants,
> + SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_QUADIO_OP(0, 4, NULL, 0),
> + SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_X4_OP(0, 1, NULL, 0),
> + SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_DUALIO_OP(0, 2, NULL, 0),
> + SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_X2_OP(0, 1, NULL, 0),
> + SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_OP(true, 0, 1, NULL, 0),
> + SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_OP(false, 0, 1, NULL, 0));
> +
> +static SPINAND_OP_VARIANTS(write_cache_variants,
> + SPINAND_PROG_LOAD_X4(true, 0, NULL, 0),
> + SPINAND_PROG_LOAD(true, 0, NULL, 0));
> +
> +static SPINAND_OP_VARIANTS(update_cache_variants,
> + SPINAND_PROG_LOAD_X4(false, 0, NULL, 0),
> + SPINAND_PROG_LOAD(false, 0, NULL, 0));
> +
> +static int skyhigh_spinand_ooblayout_ecc(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section,
> + struct mtd_oob_region *region)
> +{
> + if (section)
> + return -ERANGE;
> +
> + region->length = 0;
> + region->offset = mtd->oobsize;
The ECC bytes are not stored anywhere?
There is no problem because skyhigh's ecc parity is stored in the internal hidden area and is not needed for them.
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int skyhigh_spinand_ooblayout_free(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section,
> + struct mtd_oob_region *region) {
> + if (section)
> + return -ERANGE;
> +
> + region->length = mtd->oobsize - 2;
> + region->offset = 2;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct mtd_ooblayout_ops skyhigh_spinand_ooblayout = {
> + .ecc = skyhigh_spinand_ooblayout_ecc,
> + .free = skyhigh_spinand_ooblayout_free, };
> +
> +#if 0
Please drop debug code from your submission.
It was dropped.
> +bool skyhigh_spinand_isbad(struct spinand_device *spinand,
> + const struct nand_pos *pos)
> +{
> + u8 marker;
> + struct nand_page_io_req req = {
> + .pos = *pos,
> + .ooblen = 1,
> + .ooboffs = 0,
> + .oobbuf.in = &marker,
> + .mode = MTD_OPS_RAW,
> + };
> +
> + req.pos.page = 0;
> + spinand_read_page(spinand, &req);
> + if (marker != 0xff)
> + return true;
> +
> +#if 0
> + req.pos.page = 1;
> + spinand_read_page(spinand, &req);
> + if (marker != 0xff)
> + return true;
> +
> + req.pos.page = 63;
> + spinand_read_page(spinand, &req);
> + if (marker != 0xff)
> + return true;
> +#endif
> +
> + return false;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +static int skyhigh_spinand_ecc_get_status(struct spinand_device *spinand,
> + u8 status)
> +{
> + /* SHM
> + 00 : No bit-flip
> + 01 : 1-2 errors corrected
> + 10 : 3-6 errors corrected
> + 11 : uncorrectable
> + */
The style is wrong, checkpatch.pl --strict?
It was updated.
> +
> + switch (status & STATUS_ECC_MASK) {
> + case STATUS_ECC_NO_BITFLIPS:
> + return 0;
> +
> + case SKYHIGH_STATUS_ECC_1TO2_BITFLIPS:
> + return 2;
> +
> + /* change from 4 to 6 */
> + case SKYHIGH_STATUS_ECC_3TO4_BITFLIPS:
> + return 6;
> +
> + /* uncorrectable for '11' */
> + case SKYHIGH_STATUS_ECC_5TO6_BITFLIPS:
> + return -EBADMSG;;
The last two macro names definitely don't match what they actually mean. It's very strange. Please align the names with the real impact.
The Macros were updated.
> +
> + default:
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct spinand_info skyhigh_spinand_table[] = {
> + SPINAND_INFO("S35ML01G301",
> + SPINAND_ID(SPINAND_READID_METHOD_OPCODE_DUMMY, 0x15),
> + NAND_MEMORG(1, 2048, 64, 64, 1024, 20, 1, 1, 1),
> + NAND_ECCREQ(6, 32),
> + SPINAND_INFO_OP_VARIANTS(&read_cache_variants,
> + &write_cache_variants,
> + &update_cache_variants),
> + SPINAND_ON_DIE_ECC_MANDATORY,
> + SPINAND_ECCINFO(&skyhigh_spinand_ooblayout,
> + skyhigh_spinand_ecc_get_status)),
> + SPINAND_INFO("S35ML01G300",
> + SPINAND_ID(SPINAND_READID_METHOD_OPCODE_DUMMY, 0x14),
> + NAND_MEMORG(1, 2048, 128, 64, 1024, 20, 1, 1, 1),
> + NAND_ECCREQ(6, 32),
> + SPINAND_INFO_OP_VARIANTS(&read_cache_variants,
> + &write_cache_variants,
> + &update_cache_variants),
> + SPINAND_ON_DIE_ECC_MANDATORY,
> + SPINAND_ECCINFO(&skyhigh_spinand_ooblayout,
> + skyhigh_spinand_ecc_get_status)),
> + SPINAND_INFO("S35ML02G300",
> + SPINAND_ID(SPINAND_READID_METHOD_OPCODE_DUMMY, 0x25),
> + NAND_MEMORG(1, 2048, 128, 64, 2048, 40, 2, 1, 1),
> + NAND_ECCREQ(6, 32),
> + SPINAND_INFO_OP_VARIANTS(&read_cache_variants,
> + &write_cache_variants,
> + &update_cache_variants),
> + SPINAND_ON_DIE_ECC_MANDATORY,
> + SPINAND_ECCINFO(&skyhigh_spinand_ooblayout,
> + skyhigh_spinand_ecc_get_status)),
> + SPINAND_INFO("S35ML04G300",
> + SPINAND_ID(SPINAND_READID_METHOD_OPCODE_DUMMY, 0x35),
> + NAND_MEMORG(1, 2048, 128, 64, 4096, 80, 2, 1, 1),
> + NAND_ECCREQ(6, 32),
> + SPINAND_INFO_OP_VARIANTS(&read_cache_variants,
> + &write_cache_variants,
> + &update_cache_variants),
> + SPINAND_ON_DIE_ECC_MANDATORY,
> + SPINAND_ECCINFO(&skyhigh_spinand_ooblayout,
> + skyhigh_spinand_ecc_get_status)), };
> +
> +static int skyhigh_spinand_init(struct spinand_device *spinand) {
> + return spinand_write_reg_op(spinand, REG_BLOCK_LOCK,
> + SKYHIGH_CONFIG_PROTECT_EN);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct spinand_manufacturer_ops skyhigh_spinand_manuf_ops = {
> + .init = skyhigh_spinand_init,
> +/* .isbad = skyhigh_spinand_isbad,*/
Drop this line as well
It was dropped.
> +};
> +
> +const struct spinand_manufacturer skyhigh_spinand_manufacturer = {
> + .id = SPINAND_MFR_SKYHIGH,
> + .name = "SkyHigh",
> + .chips = skyhigh_spinand_table,
> + .nchips = ARRAY_SIZE(skyhigh_spinand_table),
> + .ops = &skyhigh_spinand_manuf_ops,
> +};
> diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/spinand.h b/include/linux/mtd/spinand.h
> old mode 100644 new mode 100755 index badb4c1ac079..0e135076df24
> --- a/include/linux/mtd/spinand.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mtd/spinand.h
> @@ -268,6 +268,7 @@ extern const struct spinand_manufacturer
> gigadevice_spinand_manufacturer; extern const struct
> spinand_manufacturer macronix_spinand_manufacturer; extern const
> struct spinand_manufacturer micron_spinand_manufacturer; extern const
> struct spinand_manufacturer paragon_spinand_manufacturer;
> +extern const struct spinand_manufacturer
> +skyhigh_spinand_manufacturer;
> extern const struct spinand_manufacturer
> toshiba_spinand_manufacturer; extern const struct
> spinand_manufacturer winbond_spinand_manufacturer; extern const
> struct spinand_manufacturer xtx_spinand_manufacturer; @@ -312,6 +313,7
> @@ struct spinand_ecc_info {
>
> #define SPINAND_HAS_QE_BIT BIT(0)
> #define SPINAND_HAS_CR_FEAT_BIT BIT(1)
> +#define SPINAND_ON_DIE_ECC_MANDATORY BIT(2) /* SHM */
>
> /**
> * struct spinand_ondie_ecc_conf - private SPI-NAND on-die ECC engine
> structure @@ -518,5 +520,6 @@ int spinand_match_and_init(struct
> spinand_device *spinand,
>
> int spinand_upd_cfg(struct spinand_device *spinand, u8 mask, u8 val);
> int spinand_select_target(struct spinand_device *spinand, unsigned int
> target);
> +int spinand_write_reg_op(struct spinand_device *spinand, u8 reg, u8
> +val);
>
> #endif /* __LINUX_MTD_SPINAND_H */
Thanks,
Miquèl
Content of type "text/html" skipped
Download attachment "0002-Skyhighmemory2.patch" of type "application/octet-stream" (3587 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists