[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ff4ba8c9-8a34-41c3-92ed-910e46e1ca99@lunn.ch>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 17:43:43 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Julien Panis <jpanis@...libre.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw: Add minimal XDP
support
> 3) From 2), am65_cpsw_alloc_skb() function removed and replaced by
> netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align(), as used by the driver before -> res = 506
> Conclusion: Here is where the loss comes from.
> IOW, My am65_cpsw_alloc_skb() function is not good.
>
> Initially, I mainly created this 'custom' am65_cpsw_alloc_skb() function
> because I thought that none of XDP memory models could be used along
> with netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align() function. Was I wrong ?
> By creating this custom am65_cpsw_alloc_skb(), I also wanted to handle
> the way headroom is reserved differently.
What is special about your device? Why would
netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align() not work?
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists