linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] coredump: get machine check errors early rather than during iov

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=wioxdFfY-kWwVs9RT9JTfYrMwqtX=LdJNMLiVSZm14SSw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 09:29:19 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Tong Tiangen <tongtiangen@...wei.com>, 
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com, Guohanjun <guohanjun@...wei.com>, 
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, Al Viro <viro@...nel.org>, 
	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, 
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] coredump: get machine check errors early rather than
 during iov_iter

On Tue, 5 Mar 2024 at 08:39, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> wrote:
>
> For what it's worth, checking the two patches, it's basically the one
> that Linus sent. I think it should have a From: based on that, and I
> also do not see Linus actually signing off on the patch, though that
> has been added to this one.
>
> Would probably be sane to get this one resent before applying, properly
> done.

I have a sign-off in my own test-tree, so it's all ok.

Sending my changelog just in case somebody wants to mix-and-match the two.

              Linus

View attachment "0001-iov_iter-get-rid-of-copy_mc-flag.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (8640 bytes)