[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f6045888-bb53-4ba2-90a9-98fc6a5254ad@acm.org>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 11:04:31 -0800
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc: Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] scsi: ufs: Re-use device management locking code
On 3/4/24 01:23, Avri Altman wrote:
> /**
> * ufshcd_exec_dev_cmd - API for sending device management requests
> * @hba: UFS hba
> @@ -3291,11 +3305,6 @@ static int ufshcd_exec_dev_cmd(struct ufs_hba *hba,
> struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp;
> int err;
>
> - /* Protects use of hba->reserved_slot. */
> - lockdep_assert_held(&hba->dev_cmd.lock);
> -
> - down_read(&hba->clk_scaling_lock);
> -
> lrbp = &hba->lrb[tag];
> lrbp->cmd = NULL;
> err = ufshcd_compose_dev_cmd(hba, lrbp, cmd_type, tag);
Please restore the lockdep_assert_held() call.
> - /* Protects use of hba->reserved_slot. */
> - lockdep_assert_held(&hba->dev_cmd.lock);
> -
> - down_read(&hba->clk_scaling_lock);
> -
> lrbp = &hba->lrb[tag];
> lrbp->cmd = NULL;
> lrbp->task_tag = tag;
Same comment here - please restore the lockdep_assert_held() call.
Otherwise this patch looks good to me.
Thanks,
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists