[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45138-65e76d00-9-580ee380@232156106>
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2024 19:05:02 +0000
From: "Shreeya Patel" <shreeya.patel@...labora.com>
To: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc: mchehab@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org, p.zabel@...gutronix.de, jose.abreu@...opsys.com, nelson.costa@...opsys.com, dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com, sebastian.reichel@...labora.com, shawn.wen@...k-chips.com, nicolas.dufresne@...labora.com, hverkuil@...all.nl, hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl, kernel@...labora.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add device tree support for HDMI RX Controller
On Tuesday, March 05, 2024 19:41 IST, Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
Hi Heiko,
>
> Am Dienstag, 5. März 2024, 13:36:46 CET schrieb Shreeya Patel:
> > Add device tree support for Synopsys DesignWare HDMI RX
> > Controller.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com>
> > Tested-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com>
> > Co-developed-by: Dingxian Wen <shawn.wen@...k-chips.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Dingxian Wen <shawn.wen@...k-chips.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Shreeya Patel <shreeya.patel@...labora.com>
> > ---
> > Changes in v2 :-
> > - Fix some of the checkpatch errors and warnings
> > - Rename resets, vo1-grf and HPD
> > - Move hdmirx_cma node to the rk3588.dtsi file
> >
> > .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-pinctrl.dtsi | 41 ++++++++++++++
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588.dtsi | 55 +++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 96 insertions(+)
>
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588.dtsi
> > index 5519c1430cb7..8adb98b99701 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588.dtsi
> > @@ -7,6 +7,24 @@
> > #include "rk3588-pinctrl.dtsi"
> >
> > / {
> > + reserved-memory {
> > + #address-cells = <2>;
> > + #size-cells = <2>;
> > + ranges;
>
> add blank line here
>
> > + /*
> > + * The 4k HDMI capture controller works only with 32bit
> > + * phys addresses and doesn't support IOMMU. HDMI RX CMA
> > + * must be reserved below 4GB.
> > + */
> > + hdmirx_cma: hdmirx_cma {
>
> phandles use "_", but node-names "-"
>
> > + compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
> > + alloc-ranges = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0xffffffff>;
> > + size = <0x0 (160 * 0x100000)>; /* 160MiB */
>
> The comment above that node, could elaborate where the value of 160MB
> originates from. I assume it is to hold n-times of 4K frames or whatever,
> but it would be helpful for people to be able to read that.
>
right, we did the following calculation to come up with this value :-
3840 * 2160 * 4 (bytes/pix) * 2 (frames/buffer) / 1000 / 1000 = 66M
and then we do the 2x times of this value to be on the safer side
and support all practical use-cases.
I'll add some more details to the comment in v3.
>
> > + no-map;
> > + status = "disabled";
> > + };
> > + };
> > +
> > pcie30_phy_grf: syscon@...b8000 {
> > compatible = "rockchip,rk3588-pcie3-phy-grf", "syscon";
> > reg = <0x0 0xfd5b8000 0x0 0x10000>;
> > @@ -85,6 +103,38 @@ i2s10_8ch: i2s@...00000 {
> > status = "disabled";
> > };
> >
> > + hdmi_receiver: hdmi-receiver@...e0000 {
>
> Maybe rename the label to "hdmirx:" ... that way in a board enabling the
> cma region, both nodes would stay close to each other?
>
Umm we already have receiver in the name so I am not sure if adding rx will be
a good idea. I was trying to keep it consistent with the names used in other device tree files.
In case you still feel otherwise then do let me know, I'll make the change.
>
> > + compatible = "rockchip,rk3588-hdmirx-ctrler", "snps,dw-hdmi-rx";
> > + reg = <0x0 0xfdee0000 0x0 0x6000>;
> > + power-domains = <&power RK3588_PD_VO1>;
> > + rockchip,grf = <&sys_grf>;
> > + rockchip,vo1-grf = <&vo1_grf>;
> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 177 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>,
> > + <GIC_SPI 436 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>,
> > + <GIC_SPI 179 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>;
> > + interrupt-names = "cec", "hdmi", "dma";
> > + clocks = <&cru ACLK_HDMIRX>,
> > + <&cru CLK_HDMIRX_AUD>,
> > + <&cru CLK_CR_PARA>,
> > + <&cru PCLK_HDMIRX>,
> > + <&cru CLK_HDMIRX_REF>,
> > + <&cru PCLK_S_HDMIRX>,
> > + <&cru HCLK_VO1>;
> > + clock-names = "aclk",
> > + "audio",
> > + "cr_para",
> > + "pclk",
> > + "ref",
> > + "hclk_s_hdmirx",
> > + "hclk_vo1";
>
> the driver uses of_reserved_mem_device_init(), so doesn't this node need
> a "memory-region = <&hdmirx_cma>; or similar?
>
yes, we should have the memory-region property here. My bad, I'll correct this in v3.
>
> > + resets = <&cru SRST_A_HDMIRX>, <&cru SRST_P_HDMIRX>,
> > + <&cru SRST_HDMIRX_REF>, <&cru SRST_A_HDMIRX_BIU>;
> > + reset-names = "axi", "apb", "ref", "biu";
> > + pinctrl-0 = <&hdmim1_rx>;
> > + pinctrl-names = "default";
> > + status = "disabled";
> > + };
> > +
> > pcie3x4: pcie@...50000 {
> > compatible = "rockchip,rk3588-pcie", "rockchip,rk3568-pcie";
> > #address-cells = <3>;
> > @@ -339,3 +389,8 @@ pcie30phy: phy@...80000 {
> > status = "disabled";
> > };
> > };
> > +
> > +&hdmirx_cma {
> > + status = "okay";
> > +};
>
> I'd assume a board that enables &hdmi_receiver would also enable hdmirx_cma
> and not the soc dtsi for _all_ boards?
>
Actually this node should be in the rock-5b.dts file instead of here.
v1 had it correct but I made a mistake in v2 :(
Thanks for pointing this out, I'll fix this and send a v3 soon.
Thanks,
Shreeya Patel
>
> Thanks
> Heiko
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kernel mailing list -- kernel@...lman.collabora.com
> To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-leave@...lman.collabora.com
> This list is managed by https://mailman.collabora.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists