[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2024030527-sinless-platter-510a@gregkh>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 22:25:11 +0000
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Cc: cve@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: CVE-2023-52560: mm/damon/vaddr-test: fix memory leak in
damon_do_test_apply_three_regions()
On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 05:51:11PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Sat 02-03-24 22:59:54, Greg KH wrote:
> > Description
> > ===========
> >
> > In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
> >
> > mm/damon/vaddr-test: fix memory leak in damon_do_test_apply_three_regions()
> >
> > When CONFIG_DAMON_VADDR_KUNIT_TEST=y and making CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK=y
> > and CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK_AUTO_SCAN=y, the below memory leak is detected.
>
> This is a kunit test case AFAICS. Is this really a CVE material?
People run kunit tests on real systems (again, we do not dictate use
cases.) So yes, fixing a memory leak that can be triggered is resolving
a weakness and so should get a CVE I would think, right?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists