linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: qcom-nvmem: add support for IPQ5321

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240305043503.tgy5ahl243or7lm5@vireshk-i7>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 10:05:03 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Kathiravan Thirumoorthy <quic_kathirav@...cinc.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Ilia Lin <ilia.lin@...nel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: qcom-nvmem: add support for IPQ5321

On 04-03-24, 12:42, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 28-02-24, 20:21, Kathiravan Thirumoorthy wrote:
> > Like all other SoCs in IPQ5332 family, cpufreq for IPQ5321 is also
> > determined by the eFuse, with the maximum limit of 1.1GHz. Add support
> > for the same.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Kathiravan Thirumoorthy <quic_kathirav@...cinc.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-nvmem.c | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-nvmem.c b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-nvmem.c
> > index ea05d9d67490..0a46b5d49d32 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-nvmem.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-nvmem.c
> > @@ -191,6 +191,7 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_kryo_name_version(struct device *cpu_dev,
> >  	case QCOM_ID_IPQ5312:
> >  	case QCOM_ID_IPQ5302:
> >  	case QCOM_ID_IPQ5300:
> > +	case QCOM_ID_IPQ5321:
> >  	case QCOM_ID_IPQ9514:
> >  	case QCOM_ID_IPQ9550:
> >  	case QCOM_ID_IPQ9554:
> 
> Applied. Thanks.

Dropped since the previous commit it required too. Can we get the
necessary acks for me to pick those ?

-- 
viresh