linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: qcom-nvmem: add support for IPQ5321

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 10:10:55 +0530
From: Kathiravan Thirumoorthy <quic_kathirav@...cinc.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
CC: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio
	<konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof
 Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley
	<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Ilia Lin <ilia.lin@...nel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki"
	<rafael@...nel.org>,
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: qcom-nvmem: add support for IPQ5321



On 3/5/2024 10:05 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 04-03-24, 12:42, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> On 28-02-24, 20:21, Kathiravan Thirumoorthy wrote:
>>> Like all other SoCs in IPQ5332 family, cpufreq for IPQ5321 is also
>>> determined by the eFuse, with the maximum limit of 1.1GHz. Add support
>>> for the same.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kathiravan Thirumoorthy <quic_kathirav@...cinc.com>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-nvmem.c | 1 +
>>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-nvmem.c b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-nvmem.c
>>> index ea05d9d67490..0a46b5d49d32 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-nvmem.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-nvmem.c
>>> @@ -191,6 +191,7 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_kryo_name_version(struct device *cpu_dev,
>>>   	case QCOM_ID_IPQ5312:
>>>   	case QCOM_ID_IPQ5302:
>>>   	case QCOM_ID_IPQ5300:
>>> +	case QCOM_ID_IPQ5321:
>>>   	case QCOM_ID_IPQ9514:
>>>   	case QCOM_ID_IPQ9550:
>>>   	case QCOM_ID_IPQ9554:
>>
>> Applied. Thanks.
> 
> Dropped since the previous commit it required too. Can we get the
> necessary acks for me to pick those ?
> 

Sorry for not mentioning the dependencies.

patch 1/3 and 2/3 are already has the R-b and A-b tags. But typically 
those patches will go via qcom tree. Do you want to pick it via your 
tree? Sorry, I'm not sure on this...


Thanks,
Kathiravan T.