linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6.7 000/163] 6.7.9-rc2 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 01:27:57 -0800
From: Ron Economos <re@...z.net>
To: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
 akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
 patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
 jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
 srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org, allen.lkml@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.7 000/163] 6.7.9-rc2 review

On 3/5/24 12:31 AM, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 07:58:57AM +0000, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.7.9 release.
>> There are 163 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> let me know.
>>
>> Responses should be made by Thu, 07 Mar 2024 07:46:26 +0000.
>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>> Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@...ive.com>
>>      riscv: Save/restore envcfg CSR during CPU suspend
>>
>> Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@...ive.com>
>>      riscv: Add a custom ISA extension for the [ms]envcfg CSR
> I left a comment in response to the off-list email about this patch,
> I don't think it's gonna work as the number this custom extension has
> been given exceeds the max in 6.7/
>
> Cheers,
> Conor.
>
>> Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@...ive.com>
>>      riscv: Fix enabling cbo.zero when running in M-mode

Yeah, it doesn't work. Here's the new error:

arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c:180:9: error: implicit declaration of 
function '__RISCV_ISA_EXT_SUPERSET'; did you mean 
'RISCV_ISA_EXT_SVPBMT'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
   180 |         __RISCV_ISA_EXT_SUPERSET(zicbom, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICBOM, 
riscv_xlinuxenvcfg_exts),
       |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
       |         RISCV_ISA_EXT_SVPBMT
arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c:180:34: error: 'zicbom' undeclared here 
(not in a function)
   180 |         __RISCV_ISA_EXT_SUPERSET(zicbom, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICBOM, 
riscv_xlinuxenvcfg_exts),
       |                                  ^~~~~~
arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c:181:34: error: 'zicboz' undeclared here 
(not in a function)
   181 |         __RISCV_ISA_EXT_SUPERSET(zicboz, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICBOZ, 
riscv_xlinuxenvcfg_exts),
       |                                  ^~~~~~
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
make[4]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:243: 
arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.o] Error 1
make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:480: arch/riscv/kernel] Error 2
make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:480: arch/riscv] Error 2