| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <ZebeuMoz8izs/SoG@yzhao56-desk.sh.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 16:58:32 +0800
From: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@...el.com>
To: Sagi Shahar <sagis@...gle.com>
CC: <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@...gle.com>,
Ryan Afranji <afranji@...gle.com>, Erdem Aktas <erdemaktas@...gle.com>,
"Isaku Yamahata" <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>, Sean Christopherson
<seanjc@...gle.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Shuah Khan
<shuah@...nel.org>, "Peter Gonda" <pgonda@...gle.com>, Haibo Xu
<haibo1.xu@...el.com>, Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com>, Vishal
Annapurve <vannapurve@...gle.com>, Roger Wang <runanwang@...gle.com>, Vipin
Sharma <vipinsh@...gle.com>, <jmattson@...gle.com>, <dmatlack@...gle.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 18/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add TDX MMIO writes
test
On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 12:46:33PM -0800, Sagi Shahar wrote:
> The test verifies MMIO writes of various sizes from the guest to the host.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sagi Shahar <sagis@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ryan Afranji <afranji@...gle.com>
> ---
> .../selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/tdx/tdx.h | 2 +
> .../selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/tdx/tdx.c | 14 +++
> .../selftests/kvm/x86_64/tdx_vm_tests.c | 85 +++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 101 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/tdx/tdx.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/tdx/tdx.h
> index 13ce60df5684..502b670ea699 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/tdx/tdx.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/tdx/tdx.h
> @@ -25,5 +25,7 @@ uint64_t tdg_vp_vmcall_instruction_wrmsr(uint64_t index, uint64_t value);
> uint64_t tdg_vp_vmcall_instruction_hlt(uint64_t interrupt_blocked_flag);
> uint64_t tdg_vp_vmcall_ve_request_mmio_read(uint64_t address, uint64_t size,
> uint64_t *data_out);
> +uint64_t tdg_vp_vmcall_ve_request_mmio_write(uint64_t address, uint64_t size,
> + uint64_t data_in);
>
> #endif // SELFTEST_TDX_TDX_H
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/tdx/tdx.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/tdx/tdx.c
> index b19f07ebc0e7..f4afa09f7e3d 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/tdx/tdx.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/tdx/tdx.c
> @@ -143,3 +143,17 @@ uint64_t tdg_vp_vmcall_ve_request_mmio_read(uint64_t address, uint64_t size,
>
> return ret;
> }
> +
> +uint64_t tdg_vp_vmcall_ve_request_mmio_write(uint64_t address, uint64_t size,
> + uint64_t data_in)
> +{
> + struct tdx_hypercall_args args = {
> + .r11 = TDG_VP_VMCALL_VE_REQUEST_MMIO,
> + .r12 = size,
> + .r13 = TDG_VP_VMCALL_VE_REQUEST_MMIO_WRITE,
> + .r14 = address,
> + .r15 = data_in,
> + };
> +
> + return __tdx_hypercall(&args, 0);
> +}
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/tdx_vm_tests.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/tdx_vm_tests.c
> index 48902b69d13e..5e28ba828a92 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/tdx_vm_tests.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/tdx_vm_tests.c
> @@ -885,6 +885,90 @@ void verify_mmio_reads(void)
> printf("\t ... PASSED\n");
> }
>
> +void guest_mmio_writes(void)
> +{
> + uint64_t ret;
> +
> + ret = tdg_vp_vmcall_ve_request_mmio_write(TDX_MMIO_TEST_ADDR, 1, 0x12);
> + if (ret)
> + tdx_test_fatal(ret);
> +
> + ret = tdg_vp_vmcall_ve_request_mmio_write(TDX_MMIO_TEST_ADDR, 2, 0x1234);
> + if (ret)
> + tdx_test_fatal(ret);
> +
> + ret = tdg_vp_vmcall_ve_request_mmio_write(TDX_MMIO_TEST_ADDR, 4, 0x12345678);
> + if (ret)
> + tdx_test_fatal(ret);
> +
> + ret = tdg_vp_vmcall_ve_request_mmio_write(TDX_MMIO_TEST_ADDR, 8, 0x1234567890ABCDEF);
> + if (ret)
> + tdx_test_fatal(ret);
> +
> + // Write across page boundary.
> + ret = tdg_vp_vmcall_ve_request_mmio_write(PAGE_SIZE - 1, 8, 0);
> + if (ret)
> + tdx_test_fatal(ret);
> +
> + tdx_test_success();
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Varifies guest MMIO writes.
> + */
> +void verify_mmio_writes(void)
> +{
> + struct kvm_vm *vm;
> + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
> +
> + uint8_t byte_1;
> + uint16_t byte_2;
> + uint32_t byte_4;
> + uint64_t byte_8;
> +
> + vm = td_create();
> + td_initialize(vm, VM_MEM_SRC_ANONYMOUS, 0);
> + vcpu = td_vcpu_add(vm, 0, guest_mmio_writes);
> + td_finalize(vm);
> +
> + printf("Verifying TD MMIO writes:\n");
> +
> + td_vcpu_run(vcpu);
> + TDX_TEST_CHECK_GUEST_FAILURE(vcpu);
> + TDX_TEST_ASSERT_MMIO(vcpu, TDX_MMIO_TEST_ADDR, 1, TDG_VP_VMCALL_VE_REQUEST_MMIO_WRITE);
> + byte_1 = *(uint8_t *)(vcpu->run->mmio.data);
> +
> + td_vcpu_run(vcpu);
> + TDX_TEST_CHECK_GUEST_FAILURE(vcpu);
> + TDX_TEST_ASSERT_MMIO(vcpu, TDX_MMIO_TEST_ADDR, 2, TDG_VP_VMCALL_VE_REQUEST_MMIO_WRITE);
> + byte_2 = *(uint16_t *)(vcpu->run->mmio.data);
> +
> + td_vcpu_run(vcpu);
> + TDX_TEST_CHECK_GUEST_FAILURE(vcpu);
> + TDX_TEST_ASSERT_MMIO(vcpu, TDX_MMIO_TEST_ADDR, 4, TDG_VP_VMCALL_VE_REQUEST_MMIO_WRITE);
> + byte_4 = *(uint32_t *)(vcpu->run->mmio.data);
> +
> + td_vcpu_run(vcpu);
> + TDX_TEST_CHECK_GUEST_FAILURE(vcpu);
> + TDX_TEST_ASSERT_MMIO(vcpu, TDX_MMIO_TEST_ADDR, 8, TDG_VP_VMCALL_VE_REQUEST_MMIO_WRITE);
> + byte_8 = *(uint64_t *)(vcpu->run->mmio.data);
> +
> + TEST_ASSERT_EQ(byte_1, 0x12);
> + TEST_ASSERT_EQ(byte_2, 0x1234);
> + TEST_ASSERT_EQ(byte_4, 0x12345678);
> + TEST_ASSERT_EQ(byte_8, 0x1234567890ABCDEF);
> +
> + td_vcpu_run(vcpu);
> + TEST_ASSERT_EQ(vcpu->run->exit_reason, KVM_EXIT_SYSTEM_EVENT);
> + TEST_ASSERT_EQ(vcpu->run->system_event.data[1], TDG_VP_VMCALL_INVALID_OPERAND);
Is it possible that this event is caused by an failure of the last 8 byte write?
i.e. though MMIO exit to host with correct value 0x1234567890ABCDEF, but guest
sees ret as TDG_VP_VMCALL_INVALID_OPERAND.
And if, coincidently, guest gets a ret=0 in the next across page boundary write,
the selftest will show "PASSED", which is not right.
> + td_vcpu_run(vcpu);
> + TDX_TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(vcpu);
> +
> + kvm_vm_free(vm);
> + printf("\t ... PASSED\n");
> +}
> +
> int main(int argc, char **argv)
> {
> setbuf(stdout, NULL);
> @@ -905,6 +989,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> run_in_new_process(&verify_guest_msr_reads);
> run_in_new_process(&verify_guest_hlt);
> run_in_new_process(&verify_mmio_reads);
> + run_in_new_process(&verify_mmio_writes);
>
> return 0;
> }
> --
> 2.43.0.472.g3155946c3a-goog
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists