[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240306082230.7ecf207b@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 08:22:30 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Ratheesh Kannoth <rkannoth@...vell.com>, Herve Codina
<herve.codina@...tlin.com>
Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] net: wan: Add support for QMC
HDLC
On Wed, 6 Mar 2024 16:01:48 +0000 Ratheesh Kannoth wrote:
> > > > + struct qmc_hdlc_desc *desc = context;
> > > > + struct net_device *netdev = desc->netdev;
> > > > + struct qmc_hdlc *qmc_hdlc = netdev_to_qmc_hdlc(netdev);
> > > Reverse xmas tree
> >
> > The reverse xmas tree order cannot be used here.
> > qmc_hdlc depends on netdev, netdev depends on desc.
> >
> ACK. Usually I get comments to split declaration and assignment for
> my patches in upstream.
Yup, that's our general preference, to split the init out of
the definition.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists